Teams

PD55/Graham/PTC

2026 STA Adult Combo 55 & Over - PD · Adult Women - 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 12 9:30 AM
Dr. Eddie Floyd Florence Tennis Center
Sep 26 9:30 AM
Palmetto Tennis Center
2026-08-29vs PD55/Poole/FTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKay Zobrist / Mary Lynn Lee vs Meg Brunson / Rita Wilhelm4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJean Witt / Pamela Cody vs Jayne Boswell / Kathleen Stedman6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLyndy Graham / Melvina Chappell vs Marlene Ward / Laura Floyd2-6, 4-6
2026-08-15vs PD55/Poole/FTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarie Player / Mary Lynn Lee vs Meg Brunson / Crystal Rogers6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Freeman / Amanda Lane vs Julieanne Yarnal / Ellen Berry6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBetsy Graham / Sandy Trexler vs Nancy Moore / Marlene Ward4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-08vs PD55/Poole/FTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKay Zobrist / Mary Lynn Lee vs Crystal Rogers / Karen Worrell6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPamela Weinberg / Jean Witt vs Audrey Hyman / Trina Stephens2-6, 3-6
2026-08-01vs PD55/Poole/FTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesBetsy Graham / Denise Weeks vs Lyrae Rogers / Robin Downing6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLyndy Graham / Linda Freeman vs Rita Wilhelm / Karen Worrell6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRaquel Lastimoso / Pamela Weinberg vs Jayne Boswell / Meg Brunson6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Adult Women - 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PD55/Graham/PTC3072556
2PD55/Poole/FTC03271598

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Raquel Lastimoso
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Kay Zobrist
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Marie Player
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Amanda Lane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Lyndy Graham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Jean Witt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Betsy Graham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Pamela Cody
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Lynn Dukes
published
2.88
Linda Freeman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Denise Weeks
published 3
2.82
Pamela Weinberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Sandy Trexler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Melvina Chappell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raquel Lastimoso + Kay Zobrist20168% games+9.7% vs expected
Amanda Lane + Raquel Lastimoso5365% games+8.5% vs expected
Marie Player + Pamela Weinberg8259% games+4.6% vs expected
Pamela Cody + Raquel Lastimoso7071% games+4.5% vs expected
Pamela Weinberg + Pamela Cody15463% games−0.5% vs expected
Jean Witt + Betsy Graham4447% games−6.1% vs expected
Linda Freeman + Pamela Weinberg224 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Trexler + Linda Freeman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Raquel Lastimoso
54W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.50
Kay Zobrist
77W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
Marie Player
48W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.38
3.5
Amanda Lane
33W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
Lyndy Graham
34W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
Jean Witt
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Betsy Graham
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
Pamela Cody
45W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.14
Lynn Dukes
15W–13L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
Linda Freeman
20W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Denise Weeks
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Pamela Weinberg
39W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
Sandy Trexler
16W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%8%
2.81
Melvina Chappell
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.