Teams

NNM 3.5M TCA - Meiers

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over League - NNM · 3.5 Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
3.69
Brian Carter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Michael Scisco
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Alan Blair
published 4
3.55
Tarek Mamlook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
David Baggerly
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.35
Antonio Londono
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Kyle Fuerschbach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Charles Finley
published 3.5
3.32
John Hellier
published
3.31
James Larivee
published 3.5
3.31
Andrew Foster
published 3.5
Eric Meiers
published 3.5
3.09
Robert Craff
published
Robert Todd
published
Scott Webster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Finley + David Baggerly6255% games+13.5% vs expected
Brian Carter + Alan Blair5168% games+10.4% vs expected
Brian Carter + Andrew Foster4157% games+6.4% vs expected
David Baggerly + Michael Scisco5352% games+5.9% vs expected
Charles Finley + James Larivee6259% games+5.4% vs expected
David Baggerly + Alan Blair8360% games+4.3% vs expected
Kyle Fuerschbach + John Hellier7159% games+1.1% vs expected
Charles Finley + John Hellier5554% games+1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Howell
58W–43L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Brian Carter
112W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Michael Scisco
65W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Alan Blair
79W–102L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Tarek Mamlook
27W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
David Baggerly
107W–84L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
3.48
3.5
Antonio Londono
70W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
Kyle Fuerschbach
46W–62L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Charles Finley
73W–56L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
John Hellier
62W–62L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
James Larivee
22W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Andrew Foster
114W–67L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Eric Meiers
11W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Craff
38W–40L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
Robert Todd
18W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Webster
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.