Teams

ACAC-Chandler

2022 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-03-26vs SAL-MarzettiWon 10
W#2 DoublesMajd Babik / Joanna Pfluger vs Beth Gardner / Richard Lloyd6-1, 6-3
2022-03-19vs MAC-LoosWon 10
W#2 DoublesMajd Babik / Joanna Pfluger vs Rebecca Loos / Wayne Motley6-2, 6-2
2022-03-05vs BURK-ButterworthWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaka Lowenstein / Majd Babik vs Katherine Carnohan / Michael Hazelwood6-3, 6-1
2022-02-28vs WW-GentryWon 30
W#1 DoublesMajd Babik / Joanna Pfluger vs Mark Duncan / Courtney Greiner6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDiego Marti Vertiz / Jeanine Wisor vs Charles Wayland / Janet Broadway6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNicole Marks / Jason Kinder vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesMajd Babik / Joanna Pfluger vs Natasha Gamboa / DEREK VONDRAK6-2, 6-3
2022-02-11vs ACAC-HallWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeanine Wisor / Ryan Radke vs Ben Hall / Julie Ruth6-4, 6-3
2022-02-06vs HERM-BerensWon 10
W#1 DoublesMajd Babik / Joanna Pfluger vs Tom Bryan / Susan Hanson6-3, 6-2
2022-02-05vs WW-WrightLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoanna Pfluger / Majd Babik vs Lauren Jones / Kevin Calhoun6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-01-29vs SAL-BerrySplit 11
W#2 DoublesMaka Lowenstein / Majd Babik vs Nina Sjogren / Christopher Corts6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJeanine Wisor / Diego Marti Vertiz vs Simon Sjogren / Karen Franks4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-01-15vs MAC-SnowLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoanna Pfluger / Majd Babik vs Carol Gregory / Naveen Chennupati6-7, 5-7
2022-01-08vs RAIN-SinsabaughLost 01
L#3 DoublesSonya Carman / Jason Kinder vs Bindhya Rusu-Mehes / Drew Campbell5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.72
4.31
Jason Kinder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Maka Lowenstein
published
3.86
Majd Babik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.78
Jeanine Wisor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Sonya Carman
published
3.43
Keith Garrison
published
Joanna Pfluger
published
Lea Doise
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Diego Marti Vertiz
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.72
4.5
Jason Kinder
157W–51L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
Maka Lowenstein
2W–12L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
4.08
4
Majd Babik
202W–105L career · 16 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Jeanine Wisor
113W–86L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
Sonya Carman
21W–16L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Keith Garrison
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
3.43
Joanna Pfluger
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lea Doise
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.