Teams

GBeal (Gaston CC)

2023 Combo Doubles 65 & Over League · 65 & Over 7.5 Men - Wed PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-04vs DMurchElliot (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Harris / MARK TERRIO vs Michael Terry / Jeff Allcock6-2
2023-09-27vs DMurchElliot (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMARK TERRIO / William Harris vs Chin Lin / Larry McCorkle4-6, 0-6
2023-09-20vs DMurchElliot (WSRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Barbour / Gary Covitz vs Jerry Holman / Terry Lewis6-1, 6-2
2023-09-14vs DMurchElliot (WSRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMARK TERRIO / William Harris vs Michael Terry / Chin Lin6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGary Covitz / Robert Barbour vs Jerry Holman / Jim Northrup6-3, 6-4
2023-09-06vs DMurchElliot (WSRC)Split 11
W#2 DoublesWilliam Harris / MARK TERRIO vs Robert Duffy / Gary Usher6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Barbour / Gary Covitz vs Michael Terry / David Murch Elliot0-6, 3-6
2023-09-04vs DMurchElliot (WSRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Barbour / Gary Covitz vs Jim Northrup / Steven Todd6-2, 6-3
2023-08-23vs DMurchElliot (WSRC)Won 20
W#2 DoublesMARK TERRIO / William Harris vs Jeff Allcock / Jerry Holman6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Barbour / Gary Covitz vs Jim Northrup / Gary Usher6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over 7.5 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Erik Witten
published 4
3.72
Gary Covitz
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.57
MARK TERRIO
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.43
Giles Beal
published 3.5
John Lineberger
published
Phillip Morgan
published
Spurgeon Mackie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MARK TERRIO + Giles Beal213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erik Witten
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.87
3.5
Gary Covitz
38W–22L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
<1%5%95%
3.72
3.5
MARK TERRIO
126W–40L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.57
3.5
Giles Beal
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.43
John Lineberger
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Phillip Morgan
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Spurgeon Mackie
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.