← Teams

CAC-Delplato

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Liz DelPlato
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
—
Penny Birkhofer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
—
Suzie Glenn
published 4
3.63
Katherine Kralj
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Tami McAra
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Crystal Bryant
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.36
Michele Snyder
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.32
Lisa Clevenger
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Barbara Seatter
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-06-11Lost 0–3
L#1 SinglesCrystal Bryant vs Carrie Willis6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBarbara Seatter / Katherine Kralj vs Nikki Nadig / Joanne Reardon6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTami McAra / Michele Snyder vs Mary Chennault / Heather Watkins6-3, 7-6
2023-06-09Lost 1–2
L#1 SinglesCrystal Bryant vs Michelle Doherty6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Seatter / Kari Martin vs Dana McKillop / Sara Salvi6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKatherine Kralj / Liz DelPlato vs Pamela Hummelt / Kelly Miller6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-03Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesLisa Clevenger / Cathryn Hansen vs Akemi Okusada / Kayleen Mendenhall6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTami McAra / Michele Snyder vs Chanon Ogden / Sammy Bui7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2023-05-27Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesCathryn Hansen / Liz DelPlato vs Loo Yah Leong / Anita Rockwell6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCrystal Bryant vs Melissa Smith2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennie Brawn / Barbara Seatter vs Michele Heinrichson / Shannon Berry7-5, 6-0
2023-05-19Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCathryn Hansen / Liz DelPlato vs Andrea Robertson / Libby North4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKari Martin / Barbara Seatter vs Linda Paulk / Jana Corder6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Lisa Clevenger vs Jan Rothert / Mary Elliott6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-05-13Won 3–0
W#1 SinglesCrystal Bryant vs Ellen Bowman7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLiz DelPlato / Barbara Seatter vs Katherine Lomartire / Cheri Martes Davis6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Clevenger / Michele Snyder vs Kathleen Murrin / Vivian Nguyen6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2023-04-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesKatherine Kralj / Jennie Brawn vs Kirsten Holmes / Angie Stromquist4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCrystal Bryant / Penny Birkhofer vs Jin Velasco / Marie Sellke6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLisa Clevenger / Barbara Seatter vs Christy Strange / Kaie Wellman6-4, 7-5
2023-04-15Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesTami McAra / Carol Devencenzi vs Mary Green-Zwemke / Sammy Bui6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKatherine Kralj / Michelle Jobe vs Denielle Edlund / Lily Looi6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBarbara Seatter / Kari Martin vs Hong Huynh / Suzanne Chambers1-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Liz DelPlato
124W–99L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Penny Birkhofer
68W–50L career
not enough data
—
4
Suzie Glenn
47W–28L career
not enough data
—
4
Katherine Kralj
142W–116L career
6%94%0%
3.63
4
Tami McAra
148W–117L career
6%94%0%
3.63
4
Crystal Bryant
105W–117L career
24%76%0%
3.53
3.5
Michele Snyder
149W–123L career
0%97%2%
3.36
3.5
Lisa Clevenger
25W–50L career
0%98%1%
3.32
3.5
Barbara Seatter
48W–60L career
1%97%2%
3.30

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.