Teams

PC-Setsaholics Sanonymous 2022

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.60 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-10-09vs CBRC-SamuelWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Atkinson / Arjun Shanker vs Kristina Berg / Sheng-Lun Tai6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVictoria Smoot / Chad Dawson vs Michelle Bell / Adam Hrebeniuk3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKristi Dawson / John Lauck vs Jolene Boughton / Evan Mehlenbacher7-5, 7-5
2021-10-09vs IND-All Mixed UpWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Huebner / Eldon Monson vs Jim Kellogg / Laura Temby3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAllison Atkinson / Arjun Shanker vs Julie Monson / Scott Monson6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKristi Dawson / John Lauck vs Zachary Ferriell / Kathleen Maple2-6, 6-7
2021-10-08vs Harmony Meadows-JaechWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Huebner / Eldon Monson vs Jacquelyn Jaech / Ryan Howell6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKristi Dawson / John Lauck vs Michael Bendtsen / Kelley Quinn0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesVictoria Smoot / Chad Dawson vs Kate Sorenson / Scott Hutchinson6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Eldon Monson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.99
Allison Atkinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Dana Holle
published 4
3.35
Jennifer Huebner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Arjun Shanker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Chad Dawson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Roman Gavino
published 3.5
3.19
Victoria Smoot
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Kristi Dawson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Theresa Koehler
published 3
John Lauck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristi Dawson + Chad Dawson12654% games−3.4% vs expected
Roman Gavino + Jennifer Huebner3353% games−4.6% vs expected
Jennifer Huebner + Eldon Monson5170% gamesnot enough data
Victoria Smoot + Chad Dawson1448% gamesnot enough data
Kristi Dawson + John Lauck123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eldon Monson
36W–15L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Allison Atkinson
31W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Dana Holle
38W–58L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Jennifer Huebner
69W–53L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Arjun Shanker
23W–10L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Chad Dawson
76W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Roman Gavino
80W–81L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Victoria Smoot
70W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Kristi Dawson
60W–57L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.96
3
Theresa Koehler
22W–19L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
John Lauck
25W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.