Teams

AR/Crum/NWA

2025 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-01vs AR/Backus/LRLost 03
L#1 DoublesMike Horsman / Val Robison vs Elliot Esmaeilpour / Dana Bennett2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKevin McCotter / Frank Mueller vs Ricky Holder / Jim Pfeiffer4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Keck / Robert Tommey vs Jerry Young / Wes Koehler2-4
2025-04-30vs OK/TennisLost 03
L#1 DoublesMike Horsman / Val Robison vs Larry Stalcup / Tom Langwell3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Tommey / Brian Keck vs Paul Bemore / Paul Mesmer5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHerbert Crum / Larry Darnell vs Keith Skelton / Denis McBride2-6, 0-6
2025-04-29vs AR/Byrd/Pre-GeezersLost 12
L#1 DoublesMike Horsman / Val Robison vs Mickey Robertson / William Stephenson2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Tommey / Brian Keck vs William Brock / Richard Chmura6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesFrank Mueller / Kevin McCotter vs Jess Vanderstek / Floyd Lang6-7, 4-6
2025-04-29vs AR/Wallman/NWAWon 21
W#1 DoublesMike Horsman / Val Robison vs David Zago / Peter Ritchie6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesFrank Mueller / Larry Darnell vs Joseph Miller / Jim Denno2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Tommey / Brian Keck vs Stuart Vess / Thomas Crawford6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Val Robison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Mike Horsman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Frank Mueller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Brian Keck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.30
Kevin McCotter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.16
Herbert Crum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Larry Darnell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Tommey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Val Robison + Mike Horsman4450% games−4.7% vs expected
Frank Mueller + Larry Darnell1438% gamesnot enough data
Frank Mueller + Kevin McCotter044 matchesnot enough data
Robert Tommey + Brian Keck224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Val Robison
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
Mike Horsman
15W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.77
Frank Mueller
5W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Brian Keck
2W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Kevin McCotter
7W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.30
Herbert Crum
0W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.16
Larry Darnell
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Tommey
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.