Teams

BASALT RED

2024 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME DOUBLES - MOUNTAINS

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-19vs CROWN REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesMeghan Hegberg / Amy Roggie vs Alexandra Braeger / Brandi Vinger1-6, 4-6
2024-07-12vs HCC PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Sale / Amy Roggie vs Jill Moneypenny / Erin Boselli6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristen Foote / Molly Jones vs Lise Lorentzen Carnes / Alisa DeMartino6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBriar Schreiber / Lauren Noble vs BARBARA DOBROT / Tammy Schiff0-6, 6-7
2024-07-05vs CROWN REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMeghan Hegberg / Ashley Richardson vs Megan Hayes / Dianne Leoni2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Jones / Anne Sale vs Judi Simecek / Peg Devan6-0, 6-1
2024-06-21vs HCC PINKWon 20
W#1 DoublesStacey Adams / Diane Boat vs Deborah Griffin / Deborah Long6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristen Foote / Meghan Hegberg vs Shannon Fedrizzi / Tammy Schiff6-4, 6-1
2024-06-07vs CROWN REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Sale / Stacey Adams vs Judi Simecek / Kimberly Welsh6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmy Roggie / Meghan Hegberg vs Brandi Vinger / Susie Demers6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAshley Richardson / Kate McRaith vs Vivian Williams / Tatum Rees3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-05-31vs HCC PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Roggie / Diane Boat vs Megan Olson / Deborah Long2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristen Foote / Molly Jones vs Shannon Fedrizzi / Deborah Griffin6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLauren Noble / Jennifer Given vs Susan Cary / BARBARA DOBROT4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME DOUBLES - MOUNTAINS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BASALT RED5113513133
2HCC PINK3310819162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Stacey Adams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Diane Boat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Anne Sale
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Amy Roggie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Meghan Hegberg
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Kristen Foote
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Lauren Noble
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Briar Schreiber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Ashley Richardson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.86
Kate McRaith
published
Jennifer Given
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Boat + Jennifer Given6759% games+3.1% vs expected
Anne Sale + Stacey Adams161058% games+2.7% vs expected
Meghan Hegberg + Lauren Noble4256% games+2.6% vs expected
Meghan Hegberg + Kate McRaith101150% games−2.2% vs expected
Anne Sale + Amy Roggie2454% gamesnot enough data
Stacey Adams + Amy Roggie4154% gamesnot enough data
Anne Sale + Diane Boat213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Adams
62W–25L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Diane Boat
65W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Anne Sale
88W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Amy Roggie
95W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Meghan Hegberg
59W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
Kristen Foote
47W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Lauren Noble
47W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Briar Schreiber
26W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Ashley Richardson
41W–53L career · 2 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.00
Kate McRaith
38W–44L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
2.86
Jennifer Given
14W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.