Teams

KY/LOU/COOK/STEEN

2025 USTA FALL 55 & Over · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-12-12vs KY/LOU/GORDINIERLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Griffin / Tina Cline vs Deanna Gordinier / Paula Edwards4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEllen Clements / Tamy Holmes vs Melissa Weidman / Karen Quinkert1-6, 3-6
2025-11-15vs KY/LOU/GORDINIERWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathy Lesmeister / Lisa Steen vs Susan Gunn / Elizabeth Torp3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-10-18vs KY/LOU/GORDINIERWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Steen / Catherine Birchfield vs Karen Quinkert / Elizabeth Torp6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Anissa Maguire
published 3.5
3.20
Lisa Steen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Karen Sturm
published
3.17
Sandra Littles
published
3.09
3.00
2.96
2.94
Tina Cline
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Jina Kang
published
2.81
Tamy Holmes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Mary Beth Meagher
published
2.73
Stephanie Kellerman
published
2.72
Daryl Alfrey
published 3
2.62
Ellen Clements
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Lesmeister
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Kellerman + Tina Cline224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Winebrenner + Tina Cline224 matchesnot enough data
Tina Cline + Tamy Holmes134 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Kellerman + Michelle Winebrenner123 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Kellerman + Tamy Holmes123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Steen + Karen Sturm123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Steen + Catherine Birchfield213 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Clements + Tamy Holmes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anissa Maguire
6W–15L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Lisa Steen
173W–163L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Karen Sturm
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Sandra Littles
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Catherine Birchfield
8W–23L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Michelle Winebrenner
26W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Tamara Duvall-McClain
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
Tina Cline
25W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%34%
2.94
Jina Kang
20W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Tamy Holmes
16W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Mary Beth Meagher
19W–30L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Stephanie Kellerman
21W–30L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Daryl Alfrey
8W–17L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Ellen Clements
6W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Kathy Lesmeister
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.