Teams

*6-BFox-CCC

2024 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-09vs *3-DNagelhout-HSWon 10
W#1 DoublesTom Luben / Travis Angle vs DAVID DELINSKY / Jeff Denhard6-2, 7-6
2024-05-02vs *2-AHabib-HRLost 01
L#3 DoublesFJ Magee / Tom Luben vs Mark Fossum / John Harlow1-6, 2-6
2024-04-25vs *7-MBland-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesFJ Magee / Michael Krisko vs Chris Stephenson / Eric Vance6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-04-23vs *4-TMiller-CHCCWon 20
W#2 DoublesMichael Krisko / FJ Magee vs James Sanders / Steve Travers7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStephen Arrowood / Tom Luben vs Aaron Meadows / Mark Oakley6-3, 6-4
2024-04-04vs *5-SWhitt-UNCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTravis Angle / FJ Magee vs Graham Terhune / Christopher Fioretti1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTom Luben / Stephen Arrowood vs Bart Bartlett / Richard Jaskot6-0, 6-0
2024-03-28vs *2-AHabib-HRLost 01
L#3 DoublesFJ Magee / Tom Luben vs Mark Fossum / James Bowers1-6, 3-6
2024-03-21vs *3-DNagelhout-HSWon 10
W#3 DoublesStephen Arrowood / Tom Luben vs Hayes Hofler / David Naden6-1, 6-2
2024-03-07vs *1-AYoung-EV-3.0-40Won 10
W#2 DoublesTom Luben / Robert Long vs Keith Buckel / Ryan Boyles6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Matthew Feldt
published
2.88
Robert Long
published
2.83
2.79
Tom Luben
usually #3 Doubles 69%, also #2 Doubles 15% · published 3
2.76
Travis Angle
published
Brent Fox
published 3
2.70
Mark Rhoades
published
2.47
FJ Magee
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher LeGrand + Mark Rhoades224 matchesnot enough data
FJ Magee + Tom Luben123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Feldt
16W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.06
Robert Long
13W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Christopher LeGrand
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Tom Luben
85W–115L career · 13 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Travis Angle
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Brent Fox
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Rhoades
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
3
FJ Magee
24W–63L career · 5 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.