Teams

OK/Harris/18&over4.0W

2023 TUL ADULT 18 & Over League · 4.0 WOMEN

17 players · average NTRP 3.67 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-28vs Burton/LFWon 50
W#1 DoublesKimberly Jones / Mary Jo Tasker vs Cynthia Causey / Kara Max1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTracy Pugh vs Geri Wisner6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGina Harris / Noel Groves vs Patti Burton / Kelly Goza4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTina Parkhill vs Alex Campbell6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDona Zanotti / Nancy Paulie vs Stephanie O'Malley / Lucia Carballo Oberle6-3, 6-1
2023-06-19vs Lusnak/LFWon 50
W#1 DoublesCarmen Freed / Pelestene Rogers vs Jordan Lusnak / Kalyn Miller6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTracy Pugh vs Andrea Williford7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMelissa Parker / Kimberly Jones vs Samantha Schoenhofer / Natalie Spreiter6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesGina Harris vs Alyssa Andrew3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Fuhr / Laura Palik vs Michelle Green / Heather Livingston7-5, 6-3
2023-06-05vs Metcalf/LFWon 50
W#1 DoublesPelestene Rogers / Heather Fuhr vs Tonia Parsons / Wendy Brooks6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTracy Pugh vs Patricia Doerr6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeborah Mocnik / Nancy Paulie vs Jennifer Kelley / Allison Gresham6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesErika Wyatt vs Kate G Green6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMelissa Parker / Gina Hasty vs Michelle Oquin / Karen Metcalf6-3, 6-2
2023-05-30vs Evers/RH91Won 32
W#1 DoublesCarmen Freed / Pelestene Rogers vs Betsy Bryce / Anjana Simpson7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesErika Wyatt vs Tuesday Evers3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Parker / Gina Hasty vs Amy Mize / Ann Stone6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesTracy Pugh vs Kelly Mason Uzzel6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGina Harris / Laura Palik vs Shannon Faulkner / Antonia Parchuri6-2, 6-2
2023-05-25vs Huntley/LFWon 32
L#1 DoublesNoel Groves / Kimberly Jones vs Jennifer Dawkins / Casey McKenzie4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesErika Wyatt vs Jillian Vivion6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGina Harris / Tracy Pugh vs Jennifer Lang / Amy Wilson6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCarmen Freed vs Serena Henderson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDeborah Mocnik / Nancy Paulie vs Angela MacRae / Stephanie Zahn3-6, 5-7
2023-05-24vs Adams/LFWon 32
W#1 DoublesMelissa Parker / Gina Hasty vs Sarah Durborow / Rachel DeWitt6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTracy Pugh vs Stefanie Lee6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDona Zanotti / Hayley Vann vs Julianna Adams / Karina Ponce de Leon6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesGina Harris vs Storey Moore1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNoel Groves / Tina Parkhill vs Kristen Schooley / Janet Crockett2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-16vs Soule'/SHWon 32
L#1 DoublesDona Zanotti / Hayley Vann vs Marcy Reed / Tracy Wagner7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesErika Wyatt vs Cindy Marshall6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarmen Freed / Pelestene Rogers vs Holly Lehman / Jessica Block4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesGina Hasty vs Kristin Hook6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Jo Tasker / Tina Parkhill vs Dede Soule / Stephanie Rupe6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2023-05-01vs Whitten/LFWon 41
W#1 DoublesMelissa Parker / Gina Hasty vs MaryCaroline Davis / Cheryl Baber6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTina Parkhill vs Morgan Guernsey5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGina Harris / Kimberly Jones vs Leah Knight / Cindy Noyes6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesTracy Pugh vs Erika Moore6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDona Zanotti / Hayley Vann vs Cheryl Sumners / Amy Whitten6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 4.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Harris/18&over4.0W8031925293
2Soule'/SH53241640352
3Evers/RH9153211945376
4Huntley/LF44221840353
5Adams/LF44211944383
6Burton/LF44192148373
7Metcalf/LF26122859404

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Carmen Freed
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.60
Tracy Pugh
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.52
Dona Zanotti
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Heather Fuhr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Gina Hasty
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.39
Erika Wyatt
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.39
Hayley Vann
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Deborah Mocnik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Laura Palik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Mary Jo Tasker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Beth Latham
published 3.5
Gina Harris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Melissa Parker
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Nancy Paulie
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Noel Groves
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Pelestene Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tina Parkhill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dona Zanotti + Mary Jo Tasker5454% games+5.8% vs expected
Tracy Pugh + Gina Harris3647% games+2.4% vs expected
Nancy Paulie + Deborah Mocnik151151% games+2.2% vs expected
Pelestene Rogers + Carmen Freed391559% games+1.7% vs expected
Melissa Parker + Gina Hasty18759% games+1.5% vs expected
Hayley Vann + Dona Zanotti17857% games+1.3% vs expected
Gina Harris + Tina Parkhill6354% games−2.1% vs expected
Hayley Vann + Gina Harris91148% games−4.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carmen Freed
144W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.64
Tracy Pugh
52W–22L career · 7 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Dona Zanotti
156W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.52
Heather Fuhr
40W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
Gina Hasty
75W–53L career · 5 lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.40
Erika Wyatt
48W–35L career · 5 lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
3.39
Hayley Vann
52W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
3.39
3.5
Deborah Mocnik
23W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Palik
22W–25L career · 2 lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
3.18
Mary Jo Tasker
53W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.09
3.5
Beth Latham
14W–23L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
Gina Harris
37W–28L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Parker
47W–24L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Paulie
50W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Noel Groves
51W–30L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Pelestene Rogers
64W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tina Parkhill
46W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.