Teams

3.5 PTC Hit And Run M18F

2024 FALL Adult 18 & Over - CAZ · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-09vs 3.5 STRC Surprise Elements% M18FWon 32
L#1 DoublesZane Culver / Tony Villarreal vs Murphy Lyons / Luc Guillemette6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDaniel Filby vs Ben Potter7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndy Palmer / Jack Pham vs Eric Ross / Keith Buikema3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKyle Lametti vs John Dial6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChris Talbot / Jameel Rizk vs Kevin Bernal / MARCUS CORLEY1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-10-05vs 3.5 MVTC Edwards M18FWon 50
W#1 DoublesZane Culver / Chris Talbot vs Solomon Gee / Luciano Hector Mendoza Spirco7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAndrew Springs vs Desso Genov6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTony Villarreal / Matthew Weber vs Jeremy Powell / Michael DiPaolo6-1, 7-5
W#2 SinglesDaniel Filby vs Paul Lai6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJack Pham / Ellis Day vs Eric Edwards / Craig Kosnik7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-21vs 3.5 KIW MambaTennis Club M18FWon 32
L#1 DoublesTony Villarreal / Kyle Lametti vs Jonathan Madrid / Jeremy Sherette4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesAndrew Springs vs Ben Jeffers6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesZane Culver / Jack Pham vs Daniel Kline / Thomas Thornton6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDaniel Filby vs Max Alfred Fernbacher2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Bostwick / Andy Palmer vs Ben Tong / Cyrus Guccione6-1, 6-0
2023-09-14vs FALL 3.5 PTC Finishians M18FWon 32
L#1 DoublesTony Villarreal / Zane Culver vs Dheeraj Yennam / Guru Bavirisetty3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChris Talbot vs Erik Gustafson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJack Pham / Andy Palmer vs Arivu Arumugam / Vinodkumar Kunjoonjukutty6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKyle Lametti vs Mat Cyz6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Bostwick / Jameel Rizk vs Navin Gangadharan / Srinivascharandeepak Pydimarry6-0, 6-4
2023-09-07vs 3.5 PAS Hariharan M18FWon 31
W#1 DoublesTony Villarreal / Matthew Weber vs Siva Sivakumar / Kaleeswara Srikanth7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAndrew Springs vs RanaAlexander Rajamedison6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAndy Palmer / Kyle Lametti vs Varun Arumugam Selvaraj / Harish Kumar Chandrasekaran4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesZane Culver / Jack Pham vs Hari Varma / Vignesh Veeraiyan6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Andrew Springs
usually #1 Singles 53%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4.5
3.59
Chris Talbot
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.46
Andy Palmer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Daniel Filby
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.37
Matthew Weber
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.27
Kyle Lametti
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Tony Villarreal
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.16
Jameel Rizk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Zane Culver
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ellis Day
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jack Pham
published
Robert Bostwick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Weber + Andrew Springs8261% games+17.4% vs expected
Jameel Rizk + Robert Bostwick8255% games+9.3% vs expected
Jack Pham + Robert Bostwick10070% games+8.7% vs expected
Tony Villarreal + Andy Palmer10351% games+6.3% vs expected
Andy Palmer + Robert Bostwick10161% games+6.1% vs expected
Matthew Weber + Tony Villarreal20658% games+5.1% vs expected
Tony Villarreal + Zane Culver0535% gamesnot enough data
Kyle Lametti + Andy Palmer134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Springs
83W–15L career · 15 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
4.20
4
Chris Talbot
39W–30L career · 10 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Andy Palmer
126W–89L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Daniel Filby
88W–101L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
3.44
Matthew Weber
130W–87L career · 15 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Kyle Lametti
54W–59L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Tony Villarreal
79W–112L career · 16 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Jameel Rizk
67W–78L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Zane Culver
68W–101L career · 12 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Ellis Day
18W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jack Pham
48W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Bostwick
82W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.