Teams

Spring

Holding Leagues · Holding

26 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NEW JERSEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · Holding
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Used Registration000000
2Refund 2000000
3Refund 3000000
4Early Winter000000
5Spring000000
6Spring 2/Summer000000
7Fall000000
8Tri-Level and Fall 2024000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Daniela Kelley
published 4.5
4.22
Betsy Ricker
published 4.5
3.95
Bass Messi
published 4
3.83
Shannon Hewitt
published 4
3.80
Joyce Zhao
published
3.54
Yun Shao
published
3.35
Erin Tobin
published
3.34
Anil Ghelani
published 3.5
3.34
Niraj Shukla
published
Cisco Mulero
published 3.5
Daniel Hudec
published 3.5
3.02
Nuala Phillips
published 3
2.98
Jane Fischetti
published
2.77
Rachel Juliana
published 3
2.34
Carla Ferrara
published 2.5
2.21
Kellie Collins
published
Anne Liivak
published
Heather Pass
published
Hong Wang
published
Jill Gardner
published
Joyce Hofmann
published
Mairead Sauter
published
Nancy Nicola
published
Ramaswami Venkatesh
published
Rebecca Marshall
published
Yuan Li
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Tobin + Shannon Hewitt571960% games+3.4% vs expected
Anil Ghelani + Niraj Shukla2346% games−2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniela Kelley
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Betsy Ricker
69W–34L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
4
Bass Messi
33W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Shannon Hewitt
262W–92L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
Joyce Zhao
51W–23L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
Yun Shao
38W–44L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
Erin Tobin
147W–81L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Anil Ghelani
126W–114L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
Niraj Shukla
46W–37L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Cisco Mulero
18W–51L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Daniel Hudec
18W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Nuala Phillips
259W–226L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02
Jane Fischetti
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Rachel Juliana
107W–119L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
2.5
Carla Ferrara
27W–94L career · no lines in 2023
0%87%13%
2.34
Kellie Collins
29W–28L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.21
Anne Liivak
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Heather Pass
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Hong Wang
186W–67L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Gardner
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joyce Hofmann
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mairead Sauter
20W–33L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Nicola
65W–96L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ramaswami Venkatesh
41W–34L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Marshall
9W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Yuan Li
74W–37L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.