Teams

Kelli Ballard

2025 Singles League 18&over-NE · 2.5 Women Singles

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-03vs Joy WhittleLost 12
L#1 SinglesKristen Turner Tucker vs Ashton Scarborough0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMegan McCarty vs Kayla Reynolds6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAlli Monts vs Samantha Weatherford6-2, 6-4
2025-11-17vs Jenna TrautmanLost 12
W#1 SinglesLauren Waldrop vs Haley Gaines6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJenna Wiygul vs Morgan Lyons7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesLogan Garner vs Heaven Day4-6, 4-6
2025-11-16vs Fulghum/CorinthLost 12
W#1 SinglesMegan McCarty vs Ashleigh Dalton6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKristen Turner Tucker vs Katy Stanley4-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesKeli Ballard vs Susan Hand-Pina5-7, 2-6
2025-11-13vs Jenna TrautmanWon 30
W#1 SinglesKeli Ballard vs Jenna Trautman6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJenna Wiygul vs Heaven Day6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesLogan Garner vs Emily Cagle7-5, 6-2
2025-11-05vs Fulghum/CorinthLost 03
L#1 SinglesKristen Turner Tucker vs Susan Hand-Pina5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLauren Waldrop vs Katy Stanley2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJenna Wiygul vs Ashley Majors6-7, 5-7
2025-10-28vs Joy WhittleLost 03
L#1 SinglesMegan McCarty vs Joy Whittle6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAlli Monts vs Ashton Scarborough1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesKeli Ballard vs Samantha Weatherford2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alli Monts
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.53
Kristen Turner Tucker
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.51
Keli Ballard
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.38
Lauren Waldrop
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.35
Megan McCarty
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
1.92
Jenna Wiygul
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Logan Garner
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keli Ballard + Kristen Turner Tucker4846% games−1.7% vs expected
Megan McCarty + Keli Ballard033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alli Monts
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristen Turner Tucker
17W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
Keli Ballard
17W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
Lauren Waldrop
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.38
Megan McCarty
16W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.35
Jenna Wiygul
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Logan Garner
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.