Teams

RCCB - Rosenquist

2026 Brevard Combo 18 & Over - Women's Summer · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-23vs Westwind - NewellWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Johnson / Heather Lawrence vs Sherri Kidder / Cheri McLachlan6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Cole / Melissa Rosenquist vs Edie Newell / Joanna Garcia6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHeather Schleicher / Gisela Alcalde vs Sandy Dahl / Amy McIntosh6-3, 6-1
2026-07-16vs Addison - ShannonWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary McCarthy / Terry Taylor vs Elizabeth Shannon / Danielle Hyatt0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesHeather Schleicher / Terry Ann Tatro vs Lyuda Saks / Kim Johnson1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Cole / Lee Harrington vs Britta Barnby / Katharine Polvino6-1, 6-1
2026-07-02vs Desoto - WellsWon 21
L#1 DoublesTerry Taylor / Gisela Alcalde vs Kileen Knight / Hollyn Knight3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Johnson / Heather Lawrence vs Maegan Hulscher / Tee Wells6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLInda Madyda / Sarah Hirji vs Eleanor Sheldon / Miriam Perlmutter6-3, 6-0
2026-06-25vs Desoto - SimmonsWon 21
W#1 DoublesTerry Taylor / Sarah Hirji vs Kelly Sabel / Cynthia Simmons6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLee Harrington / LInda Madyda vs Jennifer Thessen / Stephanie McIntosh1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelissa Rosenquist / Julie Cole vs Margaret Cornell / Jessica Vega Coots4-6, 5-7
2026-06-18vs Westwind - NewellLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary McCarthy / Melissa Johnson vs Edie Newell / Debbie Sibley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Rosenquist / Julie Wolszczak vs Sherri Kidder / Cheri McLachlan0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGisela Alcalde / Heather Schleicher vs Sandy Dahl / Sara Hatfield6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-11vs Addison - ShannonWon 21
W#1 DoublesLInda Madyda / Melissa Rosenquist vs Kim Carroll / Danielle Hyatt6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHeather Schleicher / Heather Lawrence vs Candace Starkey / Kim Johnson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarlee Miller / Lee Harrington vs Elizabeth Shannon / Dana Saunders4-6, 2-6
2026-05-28vs Desoto - WellsWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelissa Johnson / Lee Harrington vs Kileen Knight / Hollyn Knight6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Lawrence / Terry Taylor vs Tara DelGado / Gena Wools2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Schleicher / Sarah Hirji vs Nancy van Suetendael / Deborah Phillips6-4, 7-5
2026-05-14vs Desoto - SimmonsWon 30
W#1 DoublesTerry Taylor / Gisela Alcalde vs Cynthia Simmons / Jennifer Thessen7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTerry Ann Tatro / Melissa Johnson vs Mary Beardall / Patricia Spoerle6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie Cole / Melissa Rosenquist vs Claudia Berk / Shoko Hogrefe6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Julie Wolszczak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Terry Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.73
LInda Madyda
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Melissa Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.50
Heather Lawrence
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.49
Heather Schleicher
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.45
Lee Harrington
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Gisela Alcalde
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Sarah Hirji
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Melissa Rosenquist
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Terry Ann Tatro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marlee Miller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Rosenquist + Sarah Hirji6453% gamesnot enough data
Heather Schleicher + Gisela Alcalde4160% gamesnot enough data
Terry Taylor + Gisela Alcalde213 matchesnot enough data
Heather Schleicher + Sarah Hirji303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Julie Wolszczak
64W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Terry Taylor
25W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
LInda Madyda
68W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.73
Melissa Johnson
21W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Heather Lawrence
10W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
4
Heather Schleicher
71W–59L career · 5 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.49
Lee Harrington
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Gisela Alcalde
267W–176L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Sarah Hirji
135W–91L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Melissa Rosenquist
64W–82L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Terry Ann Tatro
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Marlee Miller
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.