Teams

SClark-ENO

2025 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-27vs RGildehaus-YMCASplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeff Huxtable / Chun Lav vs Michael Meyers / James White2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSteve Pigora / Todd Bachman vs David Holub / Ralph Gildehaus7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-24vs EFuguet-DFCLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Bornstein / Carl Laird vs Evan Fuguet / STUART KNECHTLE0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-04-17vs GGlish-CHTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSteve Pigora / Andy Holloman vs Stephen Ryan / Timothy Buckley6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCarl Laird / Chun Lav vs Steve Dischinger / Doug Kopec6-7, 4-6
2025-04-03vs EFuguet-DFCWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndy Holloman / Steve Pigora vs Donald Berger / STUART KNECHTLE6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-25vs GGlish-CHTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesTodd Bachman / Carl Laird vs Louis Arne / Timothy Buckley4-6, 6-7
2025-03-19vs MHolt-HSWon 10
W#3 DoublesGlen Hacker / Carl Laird vs Dave Thomas / Ralph Russo6-4, 6-2
2025-03-13vs NBuckley-HRLost 01
L#1 DoublesChun Lav / Jeff Abercrombie vs Chris Roessler / Glen Blumhardt1-6, 3-6
2025-03-06Won 20
W#2 DoublesSteve Pigora / Todd Bachman vs T Powell / Evan Yassky7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGlen Hacker / Carl Laird vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jeff Abercrombie
published
3.35
Chun Lav
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Andy Holloman
published 3.5
3.23
Steve Pigora
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Todd Bachman
published
3.16
Gregory Beyer
published
3.15
Glen Hacker
published
3.10
Jeff Huxtable
published
3.09
Bert Clancey
published 3.5
2.87
Carl Laird
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Pigora + Glen Hacker314 matchesnot enough data
Carl Laird + Chun Lav123 matchesnot enough data
Gregory Beyer + Jeff Abercrombie213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Abercrombie
27W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Chun Lav
149W–148L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Andy Holloman
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Steve Pigora
93W–110L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Todd Bachman
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Gregory Beyer
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Glen Hacker
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Jeff Huxtable
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Bert Clancey
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Carl Laird
42W–77L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.