Teams

Orange/Phan

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Combo 50 & Over- Night · 7.5 Combo 50+ - Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-13vs Sanlando-MayorcaLost 01
L#1 DoublesLuis Escalona / Eduardo Martinez Castillo vs Freddy Perez / Lenny Santiago2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-10vs Sanlando-MayorcaWon 20
W#1 DoublesJose Agreda / Esteban Scornik vs JOEL SANCHEZ / Carlos Rivera Anaya6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLuis Escalona / Rob Haben vs Freddy Perez / Walter Castro7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-11-06Won 10
W#3 DoublesLuis Escalona / Ed Parks vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-16vs Ft Galin-Walker-Wear n TearWon 10
W#1 DoublesJose Agreda / Esteban Scornik vs Timothy van Dyke / David Walker6-3, 6-3
2025-10-03vs Ft Galin-Walker-Wear n TearWon 10
W#2 DoublesEsteban Scornik / Nestor Garcia Pulido vs Timothy van Dyke / Bob Margeson6-2, 6-1
2025-10-02vs Sanlando-MayorcaWon 10
W#2 DoublesEsteban Scornik / Jose Agreda vs Freddy Perez / Marvin Yee6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50+ - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Esteban Scornik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Luis Escalona
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.63
3.57
Rob Haben
published
3.52
Tim Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Richard van Smith
published
3.40
Jake Qu
published
3.35
Nestor Garcia Pulido
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Tom Phan
published
Ed Parks
published
Joel Montes
published
Jose Agreda
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard van Smith + Nestor Garcia Pulido4161% gamesnot enough data
Esteban Scornik + Luis Escalona404 matchesnot enough data
Esteban Scornik + Eduardo Martinez Castillo224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Esteban Scornik
59W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
3.5
Luis Escalona
75W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.63
Eduardo Martinez Castillo
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Rob Haben
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.57
Tim Thomas
8W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Richard van Smith
27W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
Jake Qu
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Nestor Garcia Pulido
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Tom Phan
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.15
Ed Parks
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joel Montes
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jose Agreda
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.