Teams

DGarretson/MH/Reb

2024 Singles 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-02-08vs Stone/LR/BPWon 21
W#1 SinglesVictoria Dejoy vs Lynn Stone6-1, 5-5
L#2 SinglesJanice Corkern vs Autumn Hemphill0-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesMelaney Gee vs Anita Junior6-4, 6-2
2025-01-02vs Kohler/NLR/RebWon 30
W#1 SinglesCARMEN RICE vs Sarah Wengel6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRebecca Kinworthy vs Lisa Breeding6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesVictoria Dejoy vs Melissa Kohler6-0, 6-4
2024-12-03vs Stone/LR/BPWon 20
W#1 SinglesVictoria Dejoy vs Lynn Stone6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMelaney Gee vs Autumn Hemphill6-3, 6-2
2024-11-26vs Kohler/NLR/RebWon 10
W#1 SinglesJanice Corkern vs Joy Liaw6-1, 7-5
2024-11-25vs Kohler/NLR/RebWon 21
L#1 SinglesCARMEN RICE vs Sarah Wengel3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesVictoria Dejoy vs Robin Reed6-3, 4-4
W#3 SinglesValerie Hunt vs Wendy Hannah6-1, 6-0
2024-11-11vs Stone/LR/BPWon 21
W#1 SinglesRebecca Kinworthy vs Anita Junior6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesValerie Hunt vs Elizabeth Jara6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesGwen Wiggins vs Lynn Stone1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gwen Wiggins
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.75
Valerie Hunt
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.70
Rebecca Kinworthy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.58
Victoria Dejoy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.44
Deanna Garretson
published 3.5
3.42
CARMEN RICE
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Melaney Gee
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Janice Corkern
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Lori Smith
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gwen Wiggins
1W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Valerie Hunt
25W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Rebecca Kinworthy
163W–105L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Victoria Dejoy
25W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Deanna Garretson
33W–48L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
CARMEN RICE
41W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
Melaney Gee
35W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Janice Corkern
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori Smith
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.