Teams

LT Bloomington South Matuska 11:30am

2023 Women's Daytime Doubles · 4.5 Women

22 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.92
Malini Wijesinghe
published
4.46
Taylor Heltne
published
4.38
Linnea Benson
published
4.30
Jodi Schley
published
4.25
Brenda Bonderud
published 4.5
4.24
Elisabeth Walker
published
4.24
Douglas Matuska
published
4.23
Patricia Goodrich
published
4.16
Rhonda Greene
published
4.13
Lea Blackwell Favor
published
4.08
Rajasree Hawk
published
4.03
Cecilia Grass-Neary
published 4.5
3.89
Ann Cadwallader
published 4
3.88
Kerry Reiling
published 4
3.87
Lynda Stout
published
3.72
Andrea Boado
published 4
3.70
Stephanie Crowl
published
Jodi Hanish
published
Kim Loan Nguyen
published
Lisa Krause
published
Megan Biehn
published
Tory Borovsky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Boado + Lynda Stout4263% games+14.5% vs expected
Andrea Boado + Ann Cadwallader51244% games−7.8% vs expected
Patricia Goodrich + Jodi Schley134 matchesnot enough data
Elisabeth Walker + Linnea Benson303 matchesnot enough data
Elisabeth Walker + Lea Blackwell Favor123 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Greene + Lea Blackwell Favor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Malini Wijesinghe
30W–5L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.92
Taylor Heltne
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
4.46
Linnea Benson
17W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
4.38
Jodi Schley
25W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
4.30
4.5
Brenda Bonderud
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
4.25
Elisabeth Walker
28W–10L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
Douglas Matuska
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
4.24
Patricia Goodrich
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Rhonda Greene
25W–19L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
Lea Blackwell Favor
46W–38L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
4.13
Rajasree Hawk
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.08
4.5
Cecilia Grass-Neary
12W–26L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
4.03
4
Ann Cadwallader
13W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Kerry Reiling
252W–157L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.88
Lynda Stout
55W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Andrea Boado
60W–43L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.72
Stephanie Crowl
34W–47L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Jodi Hanish
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Loan Nguyen
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Krause
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Biehn
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tory Borovsky
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.