Teams

Sharp/Wood/Maumelle/Ind

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 3.0 Women - Weekday

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-16vs Roehrenbeck/LR/LRACLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Stapleton / Susan Coleman vs Kay Manry / Sharon Adkins6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Hopkins / Katrina Vaughn vs Susan Roehrenbeck / Cindy Kolb0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Wood / Tina Sikes vs Allyson Hendrix / Mystie Williams1-6, 0-6
2025-04-03vs Roehrenbeck/LR/LRACLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatrina Vaughn / Stephanie Hopkins vs Allyson Hendrix / Mystie Williams1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDena Wenzler / Tina Sikes vs Cindy Kolb / Susan Roehrenbeck1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSheila Sharp / Susan Coleman vs Kay Manry / Sharon Adkins7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-03-18vs Roehrenbeck/LR/LRACWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Coleman / Carol Stapleton vs Cathy Green / Theresa Blair6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Wood / Tina Sikes vs Susan Roehrenbeck / Cindy Kolb4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Hopkins / Katrina Vaughn vs Allyson Hendrix / Mystie Williams3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-02-26vs Roehrenbeck/LR/LRACWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarol Stapleton / Dena Wenzler vs Mystie Williams / Allyson Hendrix5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Coleman / Sheila Sharp vs Susan Roehrenbeck / Cindy Kolb7-5, 3-5
W#3 DoublesStephanie Hopkins / Katrina Vaughn vs Theresa Blair / Cathy Green6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Sheila Sharp
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Carol Stapleton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dena Wenzler
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.72
Stephanie Hopkins
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.71
Susan Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.71
Katrina Vaughn
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Tina Sikes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Betsy McClendon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Hopkins + Katrina Vaughn4446% games+2.2% vs expected
Sheila Sharp + Susan Coleman3747% games−11.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheila Sharp
12W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Carol Stapleton
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dena Wenzler
14W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Hopkins
12W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
Susan Coleman
16W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
Katrina Vaughn
17W–27L career · 9 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
Tina Sikes
10W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
Betsy McClendon
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.