Teams

FK Greene

2025 Marion Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Adult Women 55 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-18vs FK MostellerWon 20
W#1 DoublesCindy Hinton / NANCY TUTEN vs Donna Schafer / Josephine Robinson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoan Matlock / Sherry Louise Gronlund vs Leslie Priest / Sophia Crawley6-0, 6-4
2025-03-15vs Villages - CopelandWon 21
L#1 DoublesVictoria McClintock / NANCY TUTEN vs Mary Meek / Mary Baker4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMaggie Berardi / Joan Matlock vs Betsy Calder / Margie McLellan6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDebby McCoy / Janet Greene vs Nancy Binko / Jane Ryals6-1, 6-3
2025-03-01vs SKY EnnettLost 12
L#1 DoublesSueanne Mazzurco / Georgina Bumpas vs Barbara Turner / Carmen Rosengarten2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDebby McCoy / Mary Sievers vs Jennifer Knox / Ketty Smith2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Greene / Victoria McClintock vs Toni Maiques / Joan Kelsey6-3, 6-3
2025-02-08vs Villages - CopelandWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeorgina Bumpas / Victoria McClintock vs Margie McLellan / Betsy Calder6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Hinton / Sherry Louise Gronlund vs Mary Meek / Mary Baker1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Greene / Sueanne Mazzurco vs Nancy Binko / Jane Ryals6-3, 6-0
2025-02-01vs FK MostellerWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Roberson / Mary Sievers vs Cyndee Blackert / Leslie Priest6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Hinton / Joan Matlock vs Virginia Connors / Donna Schafer6-0, 6-1
2025-01-25vs SKY EnnettWon 21
W#1 DoublesVictoria McClintock / Joan Matlock vs Barbara Turner / Jennifer Knox0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebby McCoy / NANCY TUTEN vs Carmen Rosengarten / Susan Conaty7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMaggie Berardi / Laura Roberson vs Susan Swain / Toni Maiques3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Maggie Berardi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Janet Greene
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Victoria McClintock
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Michelle Broder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Debby McCoy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Mary Sievers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Cindy Hinton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Georgina Bumpas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Laura Roberson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
NANCY TUTEN
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Joan Matlock
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sherry Louise Gronlund
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sueanne Mazzurco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Matlock + Debby McCoy2344% gamesnot enough data
Laura Roberson + Cindy Hinton4164% gamesnot enough data
Janet Greene + Debby McCoy404 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Hinton + NANCY TUTEN213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Berardi
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.09
Janet Greene
26W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Victoria McClintock
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Michelle Broder
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
3
Debby McCoy
12W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
Mary Sievers
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Cindy Hinton
27W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Georgina Bumpas
22W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
Laura Roberson
25W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
NANCY TUTEN
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Joan Matlock
27W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
Sherry Louise Gronlund
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sueanne Mazzurco
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.