Teams

OSTC - Malone

2024 Singles League 18 & Over-GC · Women 2.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-18vs BBTC Smith 2.5 SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesKaelin Vegas vs Pam Berdine3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSarah Malone vs Lynn Hebert1-6, 1-6
2024-12-16vs Gartman-BiloxiLost 03
L#1 SinglesMegan Nettles vs Melissa Gartman0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Malone vs Erin Biancamano2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesCaroline Hollowell vs Shannon Swinford2-6, 3-6
2024-12-11vs Gartman-BiloxiSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCarlie Saylor vs Melissa Gartman6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesSavannah Macinnis vs Janet Blythe1-6, 0-6
2024-12-04vs SRYC - DiSantiWon 21
W#1 SinglesCarlie Saylor vs Katy Boyer6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKaelin Vegas vs Tracy Jackson-Wilson4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 SinglesSarah Malone vs Lacey Paquin6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-11-26vs TOCC MitchellLost 12
W#1 SinglesCarlie Saylor vs Katherine Swetman6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesSarah Malone vs Lindsey OConnell2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMegan Nettles vs Tara Mitchell1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCarlie Saylor vs Kelly Robinson6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLindsey Bourgeois vs Sabine Pierre6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesCaroline Hollowell vs Nicole Rivera6-3, 6-2
2024-11-06vs BBTC Smith 2.5 SinglesWon 21
L#1 SinglesKaelin Vegas vs Lynn Hebert1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSarah Malone vs Tyler Ash6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesCarlie Saylor vs Ann Strange6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKaelin Vegas vs Kelly Robinson6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSarah Malone vs Jennifer Mitchell7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesLindsey Bourgeois vs Sabine Pierre6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Carlie Saylor
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.36
Sarah Malone
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #3 Singles 17% · published
Caroline Hollowell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Kaelin Vegas
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Lindsey Bourgeois
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Megan Nettles
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Savannah Macinnis
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Malone + Carlie Saylor213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carlie Saylor
22W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.85
Sarah Malone
25W–18L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%85%15%
2.36
2.5
Caroline Hollowell
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kaelin Vegas
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lindsey Bourgeois
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Nettles
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Savannah Macinnis
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.