Teams

Rosenthal/Farmer - Mixed 55s 3.0 Tues.

2024 Piedmont Mixed 55 & Over · 3.0 Mixed Dbls Tues PM

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#2 DoublesMyra Propst / Thomas Conar vs Ed Widman / Linda Widman5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBobbi McEntee / ALEX GRINKIN vs Steve Elliott / Linda Widman5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesMyra Propst / Thomas Conar vs RICHARD LUGO / Mari Miller0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMyra Propst / Brian Henderson vs Ann Besterci / Dale Chadwell7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBobbi McEntee / ALEX GRINKIN vs Greg Gaines / Cindy Morris7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed Dbls Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Sara Littlejohn
published
3.02
Garland Hilliard
published
2.95
Teresa Sagraves
published
2.91
Lisa Hilliard
published
2.90
Jeff Cunningham
published
2.83
Ila Rosenthal
published
2.78
Cindy Wood
published 3
2.76
Thomas Conar
published
2.74
Brian Henderson
published 3
2.65
Myra Propst
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.47
Rose Chrismon
published
2.41
Bobbi McEntee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.35
ALEX GRINKIN
published 3
James Deterding
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Garland Hilliard + Lisa Hilliard7363% games+12.3% vs expected
Sara Littlejohn + Jeff Cunningham12656% games+5.9% vs expected
Myra Propst + Brian Henderson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Littlejohn
15W–13L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.09
Garland Hilliard
40W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
Teresa Sagraves
21W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.95
Lisa Hilliard
31W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
Jeff Cunningham
31W–50L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
Ila Rosenthal
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
2.83
3
Cindy Wood
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Thomas Conar
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Brian Henderson
25W–37L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
Myra Propst
146W–178L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65
Rose Chrismon
3W–26L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.47
3
Bobbi McEntee
87W–103L career · 2 lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.41
3
ALEX GRINKIN
2W–22L career · type A · no lines in 2024
86%14%<1%
2.35
James Deterding
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.