Teams

E. FRANK

2022 SNM 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

3 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-13vs A.MICHNOVICZLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarl Conley / Donald Hemingway vs Mark Peterson / John Trujillo4-6, 3-2
2022-04-10vs M. PORTERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoseph Santackas / Donald Hemingway vs Martin Porter / Randy Pickering3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEd Frank / C H vs Emery Borsodi / Ronald Rosenberger3-6, 3-6
2022-04-06vs A.MICHNOVICZLost 02
L#2 DoublesJoseph Santackas / C H vs Gilbert Amezquita / Robert Czerniak0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLarry Stocker / Ed Frank vs Albert Galves / Gerald Etcitty1-6, 2-6
2022-03-31vs A.MICHNOVICZLost 01
L#1 DoublesDonald Hemingway / Joseph Santackas vs Darren James / Andrew Michnovicz4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-23vs M. PORTERWon 20
W#1 DoublesDonald Hemingway / Carl Conley vs David Coyle / C H6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoseph Santackas / Ed Frank vs Emery Borsodi / Mike Locklin6-2, 6-4
2022-03-13vs M. PORTERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDonald Hemingway / Carl Conley vs Emery Borsodi / William Walz6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJoseph Santackas / C H vs Martin Porter / Rick Rios2-6, 4-6
2022-03-02vs M. PORTERLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarl Conley / Donald Hemingway vs Rick Rios / Randy Pickering2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJoseph Santackas / Larry Stocker vs Martin Porter / Mike Boyce6-7, 2-6
2022-02-27vs A.MICHNOVICZLost 03
L#1 DoublesDonald Hemingway / Carl Conley vs Darren James / Andrew Michnovicz7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoseph Santackas / A C vs John Trujillo / Robert Czerniak1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesC H / Ed Frank vs Gilbert Amezquita / Mark Peterson3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A.MICHNOVICZ7125720222
2M. PORTER53181431265
3E. FRANK0852755355

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carl Conley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ed Frank
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Joseph Santackas
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carl Conley
22W–12L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Ed Frank
17W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Santackas
18W–36L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.