Teams

LandryCook/Knoxville

2026 Combo 18 & Over- Knoxville · 6.5 Women Combo Doubles

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 8 6:15 PM
West Hills Tennis Center
Sep 20 4:30 PM
Tyson Family Tennis Center
Sep 27 4:30 PM
West Hills Tennis Center
Oct 4 4:30 PM
Tyson Family Tennis Center
2026-08-30vs Gardner/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Newell / Maria Willard vs Alicia Santiago-haslag / Alyssa Weagley5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGeri Landry / Jennifer Cook vs Kerry Crandall / Tessa Powers3-6, 3-6
2026-08-25vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Cook / Julia Beets vs Wendi Arnold / Ellen Ritchey1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGeri Landry / Maria Willard vs Isabel Cunningham / Jamie Hughes1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBrooke Thurman / Krista McIntosh vs Lisa Huffman / Elsa Roland5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-23vs Martin/KnoxvilleSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBrooke Thurman / Ashli Christen vs Mary Hutchinson / Lora Boruff7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCaroline Khoury / Krista McIntosh vs Ann Brady / Missy Moore1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.5 Women Combo Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NuyenNiethammer/Knoxville1030016
2Nelson/Knoxville1021320
3LandryCook/Knoxville000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Kaitlin Holley
published
2.87
Stefanie Adams
published
2.71
Maria Willard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Ashli Christen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Laura Brumit
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Brooke Thurman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Julia Beets
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Geri Landry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Darcy Hoffman
published 3
2.40
Caroline Khoury
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Willard + Brooke Thurman033 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Thurman + Ashli Christen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kaitlin Holley
0W–10L career · no lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Stefanie Adams
8W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Maria Willard
5W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Ashli Christen
9W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Laura Brumit
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Brooke Thurman
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Julia Beets
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.62
Geri Landry
15W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.57
3
Darcy Hoffman
16W–27L career · no lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
2.5
Caroline Khoury
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.