Teams

Liberty Park-Creamer/Maxfield

2025 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 3.5W

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-16vs SL Tennis SpinnersWon 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Wecker vs Julie Carlston7-6, 1-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaria Lombardi / Bessy Nielson vs Elizabeth Harris-Johnson / Elizabeth Michie6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2025-12-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesInga Nelson / Allison Christenson vs Jacki Joseph / Jamie Tate2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-12-02vs Ace Athletics-HarmonWon 40
W#1 DoublesAllison Kendell / Alena Taylor vs Jessica Whittaker / Kyra Dunshee6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesInga Nelson vs Camillia Groberg6-1, 5-3
W#2 DoublesAllison Christenson / Sara Green vs Rebecca Harman / Glenna Frey7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBessy Nielson / Mindy Christensen vs Angelyn Sorenson / KayeLynn BASTIAN7-6, 3-1
2025-11-18vs Sports Mall-Farr/GreenWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaria Lombardi / Alena Taylor vs Alycia Anthony / Julie Labrum6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2025-11-11vs Sports Mall-WoodWon 21
L#1 DoublesBessy Nielson / Alena Taylor vs Courtney Bedke / Sarah Nelson5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesInga Nelson vs Chelsea Wood1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Lombardi / Sara Green vs Melanie Olsen / Heather George6-0, 6-4
2025-11-04vs Sports Mall-Lake/KnowltonLost 01
L#1 DoublesInga Nelson / Allison Christenson vs Debra Knowlton / Tiffany Ujifusa6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 3.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sunpro Parker/Stringham6020414157
2Ogden-Andersen5115919182
3SunPro-Barber/Curtis5116819165
4Sports Mall-Lake/Knowlton5117720180
5Sports Mall-Farr/Green4217718178
6Ivory Ridge-Adams/Riley4215921187
7Liberty Park-Creamer/Maxfield4216824195
8Wasatch Rec Center-Wade/Stone33131126198
9Team Lowell33101430207
10Pumpkin Smashers-Leishman/Ewing3391533212
11Ivory Ridge-Hardin/Elison2481636229
12Sports Mall-Wood1571735230
13SunPro-Thorpe/Chamberlain1581636234
14SL Tennis Spinners1581636234
15Ace Athletics-Harmon1542040238
16Heber Valley-Wood/Overton0661839247

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Heather Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Michelle Maxfield
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Gretel Sampson
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.34
Bessy Nielson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Diane Creamer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Allison Kendell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Wecker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.23
Alena Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Allison Christenson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Lindsey Little
published 3.5
3.18
Inga Nelson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Kristen Okland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Maria Lombardi
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Mindy Christensen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Hall
published
Sara Green
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bessy Nielson + Maria Lombardi5255% games+7.3% vs expected
Alena Taylor + Michelle Maxfield7850% games+7.2% vs expected
Diane Creamer + Allison Kendell7170% games+5.5% vs expected
Alena Taylor + Gretel Sampson151749% games+4.0% vs expected
Mindy Christensen + Bessy Nielson8256% games+4.0% vs expected
Lindsey Little + Allison Christenson3257% games+3.5% vs expected
Diane Creamer + Kristen Okland513753% games+3.1% vs expected
Diane Creamer + Allison Christenson4351% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Hayes
84W–67L career · 1 line in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.39
Michelle Maxfield
206W–139L career · 3 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.37
3.5
Gretel Sampson
200W–198L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Bessy Nielson
213W–160L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Diane Creamer
116W–110L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Allison Kendell
74W–56L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Wecker
92W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Alena Taylor
178W–200L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Allison Christenson
94W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Lindsey Little
30W–87L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Inga Nelson
162W–124L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Kristen Okland
79W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Maria Lombardi
228W–163L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Mindy Christensen
93W–100L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Julie Hall
39W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Green
32W–76L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.