Teams

Broward/Ltc - colette

2022 Broward Adult 40 & Over · 5.0 Adult 40 & Over Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.75 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-12vs David Park - DorisLost 02
L#1 DoublesTrieste McIntosh / Colette Kienle vs Emilse Longo / Doris Montero0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesErin Manten / Sheri Adler vs Windy Dees / Jane Forman2-6, 2-6
2022-03-05vs David Park - DorisWon 10
W#1 DoublesSheri Puppo / Erin Manten vs Windy Dees / Elizabeth Galphin6-4, 6-2
2022-02-05vs David Park - DorisWon 20
W#1 DoublesColette Kienle / Trieste McIntosh vs Jane Forman / Elizabeth Galphin6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSheri Puppo / Krista Geoffrion vs Emilse Longo / Doris Montero6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-29vs David Park - DorisLost 12
L#1 DoublesSheri Adler / Erin Manten vs Elizabeth Galphin / Doris Montero7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBetty Brener vs Windy Dees7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesColette Kienle / Rocio Rodriguez vs Gabriela Castanon / Emilse Longo6-3, 6-0
2022-01-22vs David Park - DorisWon 21
W#1 DoublesSheri Puppo / Sharon Runk vs Windy Dees / Elizabeth Galphin7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesColette Kienle vs Leocadie Ahmes6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesErin Manten / Sheri Adler vs Doris Montero / Emilse Longo4-6, 2-6
2022-01-15vs David Park - DorisWon 21
W#1 DoublesSheri Puppo / Krista Geoffrion vs Doris Montero / Elizabeth Galphin1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBetty Brener vs Leocadie Ahmes7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSheri Adler / Erin Manten vs Windy Dees / Emilse Longo4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.43 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Betty Brener
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.65
Sheri Puppo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.50
Erin Manten
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.46
Colette Kienle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.41
Sharon Runk
published 4.5
4.13
Krista Geoffrion
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheri Puppo + Erin Manten5548% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Runk + Krista Geoffrion1449% gamesnot enough data
Sheri Puppo + Betty Brener134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Betty Brener
29W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
5
Sheri Puppo
81W–40L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.65
5
Erin Manten
98W–68L career · 5 lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
4.50
4.5
Colette Kienle
41W–43L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
4.46
4.5
Sharon Runk
136W–58L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
4.41
4.5
Krista Geoffrion
31W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
4.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.