Teams

TCRC Terrell / Gibson

2023 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weekday · Richmond Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Weekday

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-20vs CCV CooperWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Teefey / Courtney Greiner vs Alice Cooper / Genevieve Alley6-2, 6-1
2023-10-13vs ACAC MarksWon 10
W#2 DoublesDaniela Otto / Emily Edens vs Julie Ruth / Heather Colberg6-2, 7-5
2023-10-06vs Burkwood RowSplit 11
L#2 DoublesEmily Edens / Daniela Otto vs Susan Powell / Melissa Stewart4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDeirdre Vaughan / Katherine Clapp vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-04vs Raintree RowlandLost 02
L#2 DoublesRebecca Morgan / Daniela Otto vs Catherine Fallin / Kimberly Kimball6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesValentina Robila / Deirdre Vaughan vs Jennifer Morris / Shannon Webb2-6, 2-6
2023-09-15vs HCC HolmesWon 20
W#2 DoublesDenise Terrell / Daniela Otto vs Ashley Evans / Jane Kauder6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKatherine Clapp / Deirdre Vaughan vs Lisa Frazier / Amy Click4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-09-08vs CCV DeLaceyLost 02
L#1 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Crystal Gibson vs Esther Fratkin / Andrea Rahal5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDeirdre Vaughan / Cynthia Muncy vs Amanda Galanti / Catherine Benevento0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Ashley Hart
published 4.5
4.14
Courtney Greiner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Crystal Gibson
published 4
3.90
Denise Terrell
published 4
3.77
Rebecca Morgan
published
3.54
Daniela Otto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Cynthia Muncy
published 3.5
3.27
Deirdre Vaughan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Emily Edens
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ashley Hart
21W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
4.33
4.5
Courtney Greiner
116W–118L career · 2 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
4.14
4
Crystal Gibson
24W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Denise Terrell
21W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.90
Rebecca Morgan
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Daniela Otto
117W–203L career · 4 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Cynthia Muncy
15W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Deirdre Vaughan
162W–177L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Emily Edens
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.