Teams

CP:King Fed CP:Rehg

2021 SCT Adult 18 & Over Men · 4.5 Adult Men (1

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-06-10vs NC:Net Assets:MuellerWon 21
W#1 DoublesPhillip Rehg / Omar Ladhani vs Aaron Campos / Michael Mueller6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrian Hawe / Wulf Lueckerath vs Alfred Culliford / Rambabu Vallabhajosula6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Shields / Thomas Youn vs Tom Givone / Eric Perlmutter2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-06-06vs TCT:Blue:CoorssenWon 10
W#1 DoublesPhillip Rehg / Peter Shields vs Jeffrey Brozek / Rick Lopez6-3, 6-2
2021-05-17vs NC:Net Assets:MuellerLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeremy Goldberg / Peter Shields vs David Amendola / Michael Mueller6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrett Howard / Thomas Youn vs Ted Keating / Russell Thaler2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Hawe / Gabriel Paulk vs Robert Mitchell / Rambabu Vallabhajosula2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5 Adult Men (1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CP:King Fed CP:Rehg0431734223
2CP:Harpoons:Frank/Presley0692146320
3NC:Net Assets:Mueller0831925286
4TCT:Blue:Coorssen08202042311

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.43 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Andreas Landgrebe
published 4.5
4.35
Wulf Lueckerath
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Adam Rubin
published 4.5
Brett Howard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Brian Hawe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Gabriel Paulk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jeremy Goldberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Shields
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Phillip Rehg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Youn
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Shields + Phillip Rehg8457% games+9.6% vs expected
Thomas Youn + Brett Howard044 matchesnot enough data
Peter Shields + Thomas Youn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andreas Landgrebe
96W–40L career · no lines in 2021
<1%47%53%
4.51
Wulf Lueckerath
191W–83L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Adam Rubin
16W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Brett Howard
176W–56L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Brian Hawe
20W–16L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Gabriel Paulk
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeremy Goldberg
29W–12L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Peter Shields
156W–72L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Phillip Rehg
32W–32L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Thomas Youn
72W–44L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.