Teams

Gartman - Biloxi

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over-GC · Women 5.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-01vs DIAMONDHEAD - PowellLost 02
L#1 DoublesSabine Pierre / Catherine Wood vs Christina Milner / Leigh Ann Reynolds4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Mitchell / Cherie Griffith vs Eliza Easton / Rebecca Powell5-7, 4-6
2025-09-18vs BBTC-MATTHEWS 5.5 WOMENWon 30
W#1 DoublesCherie Griffith / Kelly Robinson vs Jordan Herrington / Brianna Beesley6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSabine Pierre / Catherine Wood vs Stacey Rishel / Joplyn Kim6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Mitchell / Beth Seymour vs Donna Matthews / Annabella Matthews6-3, 6-3
2025-09-15vs St. Martin-MathewsWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelissa Gartman / Samantha Benson vs Jo Anne Besselievre / Stephanie Chapman1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mitchell / Cassidy Owens vs Tracey Mathews / Suzanne DAQUILA6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJanet Blythe / Presley Owens vs Roshelle Pratt / Stephenie Baker6-2, 6-4
2025-09-11vs DIAMONDHEAD - PowellLost 12
L#1 DoublesCherie Griffith / Janet Blythe vs Karen Wilkerson / Rebecca Powell2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Mitchell / Beth Seymour vs Christina Milner / Leigh Ann Reynolds0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPresley Owens / Melissa Gartman vs Minerva Ixtepan / Danielle Keeton6-3, 6-3
2025-09-10vs BBTC-MATTHEWS 5.5 WOMENLost 12
L#1 DoublesCherie Griffith / Kelly Robinson vs Brianna Beesley / Tyler Ash3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanet Blythe / Samantha Benson vs Whitney Sumrall / Jordan Herrington5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRebecca Atchison / Beth Seymour vs Annabella Matthews / Donna Matthews6-1, 6-1
2025-09-04vs Swetman TOCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesRebecca Atchison / Cassidy Owens vs Kara Blevins / Tara Mitchell0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Wood / Sabine Pierre vs Lindsey OConnell / Mary Brumley6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Mitchell / Presley Owens vs Nicole Huffman / Hillary Mathis6-4, 6-4
2025-08-19vs Swetman TOCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSabine Pierre / Catherine Wood vs Katherine Swetman / Nicole Huffman6-4, 2-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mitchell / Presley Owens vs Lindsey OConnell / Caitlyn Chapman Akers6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Seymour / Rebecca Atchison vs Schyler St Amant / Holly French4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-08-14vs St. Martin-MathewsWon 20
W#2 DoublesSabine Pierre / Catherine Wood vs Lauren Purvis / Suzanne DAQUILA6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRebecca Atchison / Cassidy Owens vs Tracey Mathews / Stephenie Baker6-2, 6-4
2025-08-07vs Buckley BBTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelissa Gartman / Beth Seymour vs Amy Knight / Rachel Gillenwater2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mitchell / Presley Owens vs Adrianne Jones / Marlo Stewart6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Catherine Wood
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Cassidy Owens
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Sabine Pierre
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.65
Cherie Griffith
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.42
Rebecca Atchison
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.40
Janet Blythe
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Beth Seymour
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Melissa Gartman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Presley Owens
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Samantha Benson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Presley Owens + Cassidy Owens4348% games+7.1% vs expected
Catherine Wood + Sabine Pierre9263% games−2.4% vs expected
Melissa Gartman + Rebecca Atchison213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Catherine Wood
28W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Cassidy Owens
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sabine Pierre
32W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%13%87%
2.66
3
Cherie Griffith
19W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Rebecca Atchison
13W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.42
Janet Blythe
12W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%75%25%
2.40
2.5
Beth Seymour
3W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Gartman
8W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Presley Owens
12W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samantha Benson
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.