← Teams

MAC-Wright (8.0)

2022 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Lori Bernhardt
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.57
Thomas Turnbull
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Jonathan Barg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.25
Diane Malhotra
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Dana McKillop
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Zachary Wright
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.12
Diana Callaway
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Christian Buchholz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.04
Catherine Leedy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2022-05-21Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDiana Callaway / Clark Taylor vs Judith Kobin / Philip Chen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristian Buchholz / Zachary Wright vs Claire Thayer / Matt Thayer6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLori Bernhardt / Chresten Gram vs Sibyl Jarrett / Matt Bolte6-1, 6-1
2022-05-20Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesChristopher Graham / Lori Bernhardt vs Peter Cutrona / Linda Barr3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesThomas Turnbull / Deb Garris vs Peter Schulte / Dayna Porter6-3, 6-4
2022-04-29Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesThomas Turnbull / Deb Garris vs Bob Bedritis / Michele Bedritis6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Graham / Catherine Leedy vs Jana Hirst / Michael Yee6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesChresten Gram / Diane Malhotra vs Tim Brink / Robin Kaukonen6-2, 6-1
2022-04-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesClark Taylor / Christian Buchholz vs John Varner / RENEE VANDEGRIEND6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDiana Callaway / Chresten Gram vs Prasad Kenkaraseril / Karen Pickering7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesChristopher Graham / Dana McKillop vs Peter Schulte / Carol Chiu6-0, 6-2
2022-04-15Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesDeb Garris / Thomas Turnbull vs Deepak Kumar / Julie Hansen6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDana McKillop / Zachary Wright vs Kirk Planck / Karen Dellinger1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-01Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesDiane Malhotra / David White vs Jim Borell / Cindy Speck6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLori Bernhardt / Chresten Gram vs Philip Chen - * / Judith Kobin6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Jonathan Barg vs Naomi Steinberg / Brad Boynton6-2, 6-4
2022-03-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJonathan Barg / Dana McKillop vs Tony Moreno / Liz DelPlato6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristopher Graham / Diana Callaway vs Scott Eliason / Nenette Olson6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesClark Taylor / Lori Bernhardt vs Len Morales / Crystal Bryant7-5, 6-3
2022-03-20Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesZachary Wright / Diana Callaway vs Tony Khamsouk / Nenette Olson6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesClark Taylor / Lori Bernhardt vs Tony Moreno / Liz DelPlato6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJonathan Barg / Diane Malhotra vs Dave Vinik / Katherine Kralj6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Lori Bernhardt
28W–38L career
not enough data
—
4
Thomas Turnbull
86W–92L career
16%84%0%
3.57
4
Jonathan Barg
24W–43L career
29%71%0%
3.54
3.5
Diane Malhotra
46W–26L career
2%97%1%
3.25
3.5
Dana McKillop
23W–65L career
1%98%0%
3.24
3.5
Zachary Wright
177W–142L career
3%97%0%
3.17
3.5
Diana Callaway
7W–35L career
13%87%0%
3.12
3.5
Christian Buchholz
68W–109L career
16%84%0%
3.07
3.5
Catherine Leedy
86W–119L career
23%77%0%
3.04

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.