Teams

TeamForman- 3.0 winners (Riviera Tennis Center)

2022 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Spring Day · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-04-13Lost 01
L#4 DoublesMildred Rembisz / Veronica Estrada vs Ricki Garito / Ana Creel0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMildred Rembisz vs Lorena Guadiana0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
3.48
Mildred Rembisz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Leticia Diaz
published
3.36
Luisa Angel
published
3.33
Penelope Johnson
published
3.11
Veronica Estrada
published
3.10
Gina Marinelli
published 3.5
3.09
Paola Campanella
published
2.98
Cary Gonzalez
published 3.5
Jane Forman
published
Mirta Alvarez
published
Patricia Bowler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Penelope Johnson + Leticia Diaz10361% games+4.7% vs expected
Paola Campanella + Luisa Angel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elodie de Fabrique
10W–22L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
Mildred Rembisz
118W–53L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.48
Leticia Diaz
78W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Luisa Angel
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
Penelope Johnson
28W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Veronica Estrada
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.11
3.5
Gina Marinelli
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Paola Campanella
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Cary Gonzalez
1W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.98
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mirta Alvarez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Bowler
12W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.