Teams

John Tran-YTC-FLEX

2025 Auburn FLEX League Spring · 2.5-5.0 Men

19 players · average NTRP 3.12 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2.5-5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Scott Cullins
published
3.26
Mohamed Eldemerdash
published
3.21
David Welesko
published 3.5
3.18
Matt Schneller
published
3.18
Henry Huberdeau
published
3.16
Drew Mauldin
published
3.00
Greg Niedzwiecki
published
2.91
Eric Olsen
published
2.89
Stephen Close
published
2.80
Hongbiao Wang
published
2.80
Deming Wang
published 3
2.78
Mark Lovell
published
2.65
Robert Mahaney
published
2.54
David Hester
published 3
2.52
Derrick Frazier
published 3
2.40
Taehwan Jegal
published
Grant Kirby
published
John Andress
published
Kevan Bizilia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hongbiao Wang + Deming Wang8554% games−3.2% vs expected
David Hester + Derrick Frazier134 matchesnot enough data
Eric Olsen + Mark Lovell314 matchesnot enough data
Mohamed Eldemerdash + Drew Mauldin404 matchesnot enough data
David Hester + Scott Cullins213 matchesnot enough data
David Hester + Kevan Bizilia123 matchesnot enough data
Henry Huberdeau + Mohamed Eldemerdash303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Cullins
21W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
Mohamed Eldemerdash
28W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
3.5
David Welesko
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Matt Schneller
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Henry Huberdeau
18W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Drew Mauldin
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Greg Niedzwiecki
10W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Eric Olsen
22W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Stephen Close
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Hongbiao Wang
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Deming Wang
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Mark Lovell
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Robert Mahaney
9W–17L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
3
David Hester
7W–22L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Derrick Frazier
7W–19L career · type S · no lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
2.52
Taehwan Jegal
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.40
Grant Kirby
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Andress
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevan Bizilia
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.