Teams

TJames (CSRC)

2024 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 7.5 Men - Mon PM

13 players · average NTRP 3.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-30vs KSathyamoorthy (Lifetime)Won 20
W#2 DoublesChris Elkins / Allan Reich vs Peter Scopinich / Todd Paris6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesReed Griffith / Michael Ziemer vs Juha Lehtinen / Sunil Mehta6-1, 6-3
2024-09-23vs PKartes/RBombien (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJay Pfeifer / Allan Reich vs Patrick Kartes / Rudy Bombien2-6, 3-6
2024-09-17vs MRyan (Carmel)Split 11
L#2 DoublesReed Griffith / Allan Reich vs David Hoeske / Patrick Dwyer2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSam Moran / Matt Kinser vs Mike Ryan / Scott Kaiser6-3, 6-3
2024-09-09vs DWatson (Queens)Won 20
W#2 DoublesBrian Scaffidi / Allan Reich vs Roy Ojiligwe / Kurt Davenport6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJay Pfeifer / Matt Kinser vs Ben Jarrell / Neal Koger6-1, 6-0
2024-08-26vs GPawlush (WSRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesReed Griffith / Allan Reich vs Frank Masucci / Roy Hall6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-08-12vs RPietrykowski (PPRSC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesAllan Reich / Jay Pfeifer vs Rick Clark / David Moore6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 7.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Michael Ziemer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Chris Elkins
published 4
3.76
Andrew Nesbitt
published 4
3.73
Allan Reich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Brian Scaffidi
published 4
3.71
Trey Walters
published
3.56
Michael Boyce
published
3.52
Ted James
published
3.26
Matt Kinser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Jay Pfeifer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Preston Hurrell
published
Reed Griffith
published
Sam Moran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matt Kinser + Jay Pfeifer7256% games+1.7% vs expected
Jay Pfeifer + Allan Reich314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Boyce + Allan Reich213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michael Ziemer
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Chris Elkins
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Andrew Nesbitt
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Allan Reich
36W–13L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Brian Scaffidi
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.72
Trey Walters
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
Michael Boyce
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
Ted James
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Matt Kinser
30W–35L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Jay Pfeifer
28W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Preston Hurrell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Reed Griffith
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sam Moran
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.