Teams

TOC.Steet

2022 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 7.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-24vs MVL.JamesLost 01
L#2 DoublesJames Klemenz / Nicholas Broccolo vs Spencer Llewellyn / Andrew Christenson4-6, 5-7
2022-09-17vs PW.PerezLost 01
L#2 DoublesJames Klemenz / Ryan Goff vs Joe Francis / Edwal Stone4-6, 5-7
2022-08-27vs TOC.MerckLost 01
L#3 DoublesJames Klemenz / Scott Daniel vs Eli Jerchower / David Corcoran6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-08-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCharles Gordon / Joseph Swoager vs Andrew Christenson / Benjamin Albright1-6, 5-7
2022-08-06vs PW.PerezWon 10
W#3 DoublesJames Klemenz / Scott Daniel vs Kevin Fitzgerald / Joe Francis3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Tyler Carroll
published
3.80
James Klemenz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Joseph Swoager
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Cliff Manion
published 4
3.64
John Nealis
published
3.53
Charles Gordon
published 3.5
3.44
Ryan Goff
published
3.32
Taylor VICK
published
3.10
Thomas Steet
published
2.97
Scott Daniel
published
2.95
Nicholas Broccolo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Goff + Charles Gordon2743% games−5.7% vs expected
John Nealis + Taylor VICK033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Carroll
29W–29L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
4.31
4
James Klemenz
188W–132L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Joseph Swoager
53W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Cliff Manion
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
John Nealis
22W–21L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Charles Gordon
19W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
Ryan Goff
14W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
Taylor VICK
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Thomas Steet
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.10
Scott Daniel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
Nicholas Broccolo
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.