Teams

Cloar/Good/LR/Reb

2025 Triple Threat Doubles League 18 & Over · 3.0 Triple Threat

14 players · average NTRP 3.10 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings6 teams · 3.0 Triple Threat
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Webster/CON/BP40841093
2Cloar/Good/LR/Reb328714122
3Shaddock/LR/Rebs339922167
4Titus/LR/Rebs237818135
5Garretson/Hopkins/LR/BP236919129
6Robinson/Benton/Reb1571125173

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Carter Morris
published 3.5
3.12
Kaitlyn Witherell
published
3.06
Dean Worley
published 3
3.05
Max Good
published
2.99
Karen Shepherd
published
2.82
Leslie Cloar
published
2.80
Don Dobbins
published 3
2.74
Melanie Lyons
published
2.72
Donald Deaton
published 3
2.71
Katrina Vaughn
published
2.56
Christa Clark
published 3
John Masching
published
Michael Shepherd
published
Sarah Rech
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Lyons + Christa Clark2544% games−4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carter Morris
29W–30L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
Kaitlyn Witherell
43W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.12
3
Dean Worley
57W–36L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.06
Max Good
32W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.05
Karen Shepherd
60W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Leslie Cloar
23W–22L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Don Dobbins
22W–34L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Melanie Lyons
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Donald Deaton
21W–12L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
Katrina Vaughn
17W–27L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Christa Clark
11W–37L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
John Masching
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Shepherd
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Rech
16W–26L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.