Teams

GSTL55/Full/GrandeDunes

2025 Adult 55 & Over - GSTL · Adult Men 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-06vs GSTL55/Jowers/StablesLost 02
L#1 DoublesROB SAPPENFIELD / Terry Walden vs Willis Jowers / Joe Palminteri5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJames Full / Brian Koehn vs Keith Wilcox / Dan Estes2-6, 3-6
2025-04-09vs GSTL55/Walsh/WachesawWon 21
W#1 DoublesROB SAPPENFIELD / Terry Walden vs GREG WAYBRIGHT / Pat Walsh6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJames Full / Roberto Ferraro vs Leonard Adams / Robert Farrar1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesFernando Astorga / Brian Koehn vs Jeff Mullican / John LaRochelle6-0, 6-4
2025-04-02vs GSTL55/Jowers/StablesLost 03
L#1 DoublesRoberto Ferraro / Terry Walden vs Richard Loveland / Doug Costin0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJames Full / John Connors vs Dan Maxwell / Joe Palminteri1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Koehn / Roger Bryan vs Harry Stribos / John Martin2-6, 0-6
2025-03-19vs GSTL55/Walsh/WachesawLost 12
W#1 DoublesRichard Babyak / Terry Walden vs Pat Walsh / James Johnson2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJames Full / Roberto Ferraro vs Gary Wilson / Leonard Adams0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRoger Bryan / James Campbell vs GREG WAYBRIGHT / David Adamson2-6, 3-6
2025-03-12vs GSTL55/Jowers/StablesLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Full / ROB SAPPENFIELD vs Richard Loveland / Doug Costin2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Babyak / Terry Walden vs Keith Wilcox / Joe Palminteri6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRoger Bryan / James Campbell vs John Martin / Harry Stribos3-6, 0-6
2025-02-28vs GSTL55/Jowers/StablesLost 12
W#1 DoublesROB SAPPENFIELD / James Full vs Willis Jowers / Dan Estes7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRoger Bryan / Richard Babyak vs Keith Wilcox / Harry Stribos1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesHoward Alexander / John Connors vs Richard Loveland / Doug Costin1-6, 0-6
2025-02-26vs GSTL55/Walsh/WachesawLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Full / ROB SAPPENFIELD vs Leonard Adams / Gary Wilson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRoberto Ferraro / Richard Babyak vs James Johnson / Robert Farrar6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Campbell / John Michnowicz vs David Adamson / Jeff Mullican1-6, 4-6
2025-02-05vs GSTL55/Walsh/WachesawLost 03
L#1 DoublesROB SAPPENFIELD / John Connors vs Pat Walsh / James Johnson6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Babyak / John Michnowicz vs Gary Wilson / David Adamson1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRoger Bryan / Paul MacGregor vs Jeff Mullican / John LaRochelle3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Richard Babyak
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.25
ROB SAPPENFIELD
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Terry Walden
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.00
Roberto Ferraro
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
James Full
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.88
Paul MacGregor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Brad Rittersporn
published 3
Brian Koehn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Fernando Astorga
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Howard Alexander
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Michnowicz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roger Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Walden + Richard Babyak5153% games+4.6% vs expected
Terry Walden + ROB SAPPENFIELD3449% games+1.6% vs expected
Roberto Ferraro + ROB SAPPENFIELD213 matchesnot enough data
ROB SAPPENFIELD + James Full123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Babyak
15W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
ROB SAPPENFIELD
31W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.25
Terry Walden
27W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.07
Roberto Ferraro
16W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
James Full
1W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
Paul MacGregor
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Brad Rittersporn
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Brian Koehn
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Fernando Astorga
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Howard Alexander
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
John Michnowicz
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roger Bryan
0W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.