Teams

LATA55/alexander/SSP

2025 Adult 55 & Over - USTA · Adult Men - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-29vs LATA55/Basinger/CAMPLost 03
L#1 DoublesKenji Uyeda / Thomas Jackson vs Van Horton / Jeffrey Hauser6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonald Hare / Mark DiMaggio vs Larry Ellisor / Chris Stader6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGeorge Hayes / Donald Jackson vs Tad Schmitt / Mike Swindall1-6, 0-6
2025-03-08vs LATA55/Basinger/CAMPWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark DiMaggio / Jonathan Lipsi vs William Joachim / Randy Basinger0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKenji Uyeda / Thomas Jackson vs Jeff Howle / Mike Swindall6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHenry Timms / Robert Denter vs Chris Stader / Tad Schmitt4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Jonathan Lipsi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Mark DiMaggio
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Donald Hare
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Phil Tollison
published
3.02
Jeffrey Alexander
published
3.01
Robert Denter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Scott Satterfield
published
2.86
Scott Prince
published
2.81
Kenji Uyeda
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Henry Timms
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Donald Jackson
published
George Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Henry Timms + Robert Denter044 matchesnot enough data
Donald Hare + Mark DiMaggio123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Lipsi
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Mark DiMaggio
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Donald Hare
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.08
Phil Tollison
43W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Jeffrey Alexander
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Robert Denter
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
Scott Satterfield
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Scott Prince
26W–26L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Kenji Uyeda
9W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Henry Timms
25W–98L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Donald Jackson
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
George Hayes
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Jackson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.