Teams

SGV Noobies B-Cheng-San Marino High/SU2

2024 Tri-Level League - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.20 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesThai Nguyen / Blason Taon vs Thien Nguyen / Billy Han6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2024-09-07vs SoCal/Tang/Tri-Level4.5MLost 02
L#2 DoublesDarren Earl / Alan Han vs Christopher Contreras / Anthony Lim3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBlason Taon / Jeffrey Kwok vs Thien Nguyen / Billy Han6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBlason Taon / Darren Earl vs Bill Petrocelli / Kevin Lam4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-08-17vs SGV Dare Doubles-Yeh-WN/SUSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDarren Earl / Mark Cheng vs Ryan Cox / Jason Mahn3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBlason Taon / Jeffrey Kwok vs Joseph Dychioco / Woo Kim7-5, 7-5
2024-07-21vs SGV Dare Doubles-Yeh-WN/SUSplit 11
L#2 DoublesReeve Alvin Estioko / Darren Earl vs Max Seong Cho / Jesse Rosas3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Kwok / Blason Taon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Charlie Kuoch
published 4.5
4.08
Alan Han
published 4.5
3.97
Sebastian Koh
published
3.84
Huan Xu
published
Delong Cen
published 4
3.74
Blason Taon
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.59
Darren Earl
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.36
Thai Nguyen
published
3.21
Jeffrey Kwok
published
2.93
Sheldon Botler
published
Jordan Cheng
published
Reeve Alvin Estioko
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sebastian Koh + Alan Han033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charlie Kuoch
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Alan Han
21W–13L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
Sebastian Koh
18W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
Huan Xu
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.84
4
Delong Cen
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Blason Taon
84W–56L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Darren Earl
108W–148L career · 4 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
Thai Nguyen
29W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
Jeffrey Kwok
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Sheldon Botler
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
Jordan Cheng
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Reeve Alvin Estioko
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.