Teams

LFarber-CHTC

2026 Eno River Adult 65 & Over · 65 Over Adult 3.5 Women Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-21vs DRoach-CHCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesCheryl Stevens / Heidi Blankenship vs Susan DeNuzzio / Laura Leshin6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAllison Worthy / Denise Corey vs Sara Morgan / Nancy Young2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSheila Newton / Araya Coffey vs Christy Bowman / Jean Neville7-5, 6-4
2026-04-07vs LMyer-HVCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Fitzpatrick / Mel Huey vs Patty Hubbard / Laurie Myer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSheila Newton / Araya Coffey vs Ruth Caccavale / Barbara Gillespie0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Wander / Virginia Higuchi vs Nancy Pike / Diane Willis4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-31vs DRoach-CHCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesHana Mastro / Cheryl Stevens vs Deon Roach / Susan DeNuzzio6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLynne Farber / Anne Wander vs Nancy McLaughlin / Christy Bowman6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAraya Coffey / Cynthia Kleeberger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-28vs DAdams-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Fitzpatrick / Heidi Blankenship vs Susana Harvey / Mary Parker4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHana Mastro / Cheryl Stevens vs Deb Lanier / Debbie Powell0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFrances Henderson / Sheila Newton vs Caroline Patzer / Carole Bobby2-6, 3-6
2026-03-10vs LMyer-HVCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Fitzpatrick / Heidi Blankenship vs Ruth Caccavale / Marti Jenkins6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAllison Worthy / Frances Henderson vs Beth Sholtz / Thekla Pappas6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCynthia Kleeberger / Virginia Higuchi vs Kathleen Remmer / Carolyn Davidson6-0, 7-6
2026-03-04vs KChaney-YMCAWon 21
W#1 DoublesHana Mastro / Heidi Blankenship vs Gay Engelbrecht / Denise Heinze6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAllison Worthy / Virginia Higuchi vs Sally Mauriello / Elaine Bardes5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDenise Corey / Cynthia Kleeberger vs Shuqin Liang / Katherine Chaney3-6, 4-6
2026-03-03vs KChaney-YMCALost 12
L#1 DoublesMel Huey / Frances Henderson vs Claire Blackwelder / Kathy Reedy4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVirginia Higuchi / Anne Wander vs Shuqin Liang / Sally Mauriello6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLynne Farber / Yvonne Acker vs Denise Heinze / Gay Engelbrecht6-1, 6-1
2026-02-17vs DAdams-DURLost 12
W#1 DoublesCheryl Stevens / Hana Mastro vs Deb Lanier / Susana Harvey6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Fitzpatrick / Lynne Farber vs Caroline Patzer / Donna Holtaway2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesYvonne Acker / Denise Corey vs Mary Parker / Nancy Draughon5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 Over Adult 3.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Melissa Fitzpatrick
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Heidi Blankenship
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Cheryl Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Hana Mastro
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Anne Wander
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Allison Worthy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Denise Corey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Virginia Higuchi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Lynne Farber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Yvonne Acker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Frances Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Sheila Newton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Araya Coffey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Cynthia Kleeberger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Mel Huey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hana Mastro + Cheryl Stevens314 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Fitzpatrick + Heidi Blankenship224 matchesnot enough data
Araya Coffey + Yvonne Acker404 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Stevens + Heidi Blankenship303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Fitzpatrick
39W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
Heidi Blankenship
17W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Cheryl Stevens
17W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Hana Mastro
9W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Anne Wander
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Allison Worthy
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Denise Corey
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Virginia Higuchi
7W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Lynne Farber
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Yvonne Acker
125W–166L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Frances Henderson
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Sheila Newton
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Araya Coffey
84W–80L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Cynthia Kleeberger
57W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Mel Huey
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.