Teams

SGV Triforces-D.Li-WN/SA

2025 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesThinh Do / Paul de Lumen vs Juan Francisco JR Betancourt / Arnold Lopez2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJoseph Widman vs Anthony Choi4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRoger Wang / Trenman Yau vs Robert de la Costa / Christian Crosbie6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAnthony Tsao vs Joshua Esparza7-6, 7-5
L#1 DoublesJonathan Talbot / Roger Wang vs Won Cho / Scott Heringer2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAnthony Tsao vs Seng Lao6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTrenman Yau / Ron Borje vs Dwight Guinto / Jeffrey Lee6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesFangrui Chen vs Shih-hao James Pang4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Li / Michael Vasquez vs Jai Dicipulo / Hien Tran2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesThinh Do / Jonathan Talbot vs Daniel Kanemoto / John Proulx7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesFangrui Chen vs Andrew Nguyen4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRon Borje / Trenman Yau vs Jay Ho / Shao Chen5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJoseph Widman vs He Yang Li2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Anthony Tsao
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.83
Jonathan Talbot
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Joseph Widman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.77
Roger Wang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Fangrui Chen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.69
Sergio Ibarra
published
3.65
Ron Borje
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Trenman Yau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Michael Vasquez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paul de Lumen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thinh Do
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sergio Ibarra + Trenman Yau303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Tsao
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
Jonathan Talbot
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Joseph Widman
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
Roger Wang
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Fangrui Chen
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Sergio Ibarra
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Ron Borje
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.65
Trenman Yau
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.63
Michael Vasquez
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Paul de Lumen
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Thinh Do
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.