Teams

Silver/Memphis

2025 Combo 40 & Over - Memphis · 8.5 40 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-17vs Garrott/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHala Hakim / Vail Gates vs Anne Fairey / Ashley Robinson6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPatricia Dewey / Margo Gruen vs Palmer Smith / Whitney Bricken0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-10vs Garrott/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesANITA ARBELAEZ / Stephanie Longsworth vs Megan Grinder / Laura Stafford6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Woodmansee / Paige Lonergan vs Elizabeth Garrott / Anne Fairey3-6, 2-6
2025-09-03vs Garrott/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesHala Hakim / Elizabeth Woodmansee vs Caroline Smith / Whitney Bricken6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Dewey / Vail Gates vs Megan Grinder / Paige Proctor6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesANITA ARBELAEZ / Stephanie Longsworth vs Elizabeth Garrott / Palmer Burt6-0, 6-1
2025-08-27vs Garrott/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesLee Anne Futrell / Paige Lonergan vs Palmer Smith / Whitney Bricken4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesPatricia Dewey / Candace Savage vs Bowie Campbell / Paige Proctor6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesANITA ARBELAEZ / Deana Templeton vs Caroline Smith / Laura Stafford6-2, 6-2
2025-08-21vs Garrott/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatricia Dewey / Lisa Silver vs Megan Grinder / Elizabeth Garrott7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesANITA ARBELAEZ / Silvia Hecht vs Caroline Smith / Palmer Burt6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLee Anne Futrell / Vail Gates vs Laura Stafford / Whitney Bricken6-4, 6-1
2025-08-20vs Garrott/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatricia Dewey / Lisa Silver vs Jeanne Hollis / Melissa Reddoch6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHala Hakim / Margo Gruen vs Megan Grinder / Paige Proctor7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLee Anne Futrell / Candace Savage vs Palmer Smith / Anne Fairey4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-13vs Garrott/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesHala Hakim / Stephanie Longsworth vs Whitney Bricken / Palmer Smith2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Silver / Patricia Dewey vs Bowie Campbell / Elizabeth Garrott6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesVail Gates / Deana Templeton vs Megan Grinder / Laura Stafford3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
ANITA ARBELAEZ
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.00
Hala Hakim
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.00
Patricia Dewey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.93
Stephanie Longsworth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Paige Lonergan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Candace Savage
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Deana Templeton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Silvia Hecht
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Margo Gruen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Vail Gates
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.43
Elizabeth Woodmansee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lee Anne Futrell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Silver
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vail Gates + Deana Templeton4258% games+0.4% vs expected
Margo Gruen + Lee Anne Futrell224 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Dewey + Lisa Silver404 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Dewey + Silvia Hecht224 matchesnot enough data
Vail Gates + Silvia Hecht134 matchesnot enough data
Margo Gruen + Hala Hakim123 matchesnot enough data
Margo Gruen + Deana Templeton213 matchesnot enough data
Hala Hakim + Patricia Dewey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
ANITA ARBELAEZ
14W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
4.09
Hala Hakim
13W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
Patricia Dewey
14W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
Stephanie Longsworth
21W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
Paige Lonergan
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Candace Savage
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Deana Templeton
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Silvia Hecht
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Margo Gruen
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Vail Gates
10W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Elizabeth Woodmansee
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.43
Lee Anne Futrell
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Silver
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.