Teams

Cottonwood Club - Special K

2025 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 2.5W

16 players · average NTRP 2.57 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-20vs Liberty Park-For the LoveLost 03
L#1 DoublesSandra Sweetland / Kristin Rocke vs Jenna Pike / Adri Soffe2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKristine Johnson / Crystal Connors vs Ali Love / Kimberly Chytraus3-6, 5-6
L#3 DoublesKristin Bretz / Katie Mikula vs Ashley Theodore / Tiffany Rodriguez6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-12-13vs Level UpWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Harrison / Sandra Sweetland vs Neena Yoon / Kirsten Short6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathryn Tunacik / Kristine Johnson vs Kassidy Oasay / Linda Zhang4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristin Bretz / Crystal Connors vs Chichi Eke-Ukoh / Shalee Jenkins6-1, 6-1
2025-12-06vs SL Tennis-TurnbowSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Harrison / Kathryn Tunacik vs Amanda Vaskovich / Maggie Reynolds6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCrystal Connors / Amelya Freed vs Dart Schmalz / Laura Hughes4-6, 2-6
2025-11-15vs Liberty Park-En FuegoLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristin Bretz / Carrie Peterson vs Janelle Freund / Elizabeth Robinson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCrystal Connors / Lisa Harrison vs Lacey Johnson / Marley Dominguez3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Tunacik / Katie Mikula vs Heather Gough / Mindy Wilson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-08vs Sports Mall-Team FunLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristin Rocke / Carrie Peterson vs Tejaswini Vaidya / Aishan Zhong3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKristine Johnson / Lisa Harrison vs Artiska Dorsey / Olivia Moreton4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKylee Bryson / Lindsay Sparks vs Anna Eschler / Corina Nabaum7-5, 3-2
2025-11-01vs Level UpWon 20
W#2 DoublesKristine Johnson / Lisa Harrison vs Amy Gadberry / Bri Hernandez6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCrystal Connors / Kristin Bretz vs Linda Zhang / Neena Yoon7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liberty Park-For the Love4211718148
2Cottonwood Club - Special K3381020158
3SL Tennis-Turnbow1561225167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.55
Kate Hazelwood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Lisa Harrison
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.50
Holly Ricker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Kristin Hutchins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Kristin Bretz
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.38
Carrie Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.32
Kylee Bryson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.27
Kathryn Tunacik
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Emily Miska
published 2.5
2.24
Crystal Connors
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.18
Kristin Rocke
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.05
Amelya Freed
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.03
Sandra Sweetland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.99
Lindsay Sparks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.91
Katie Mikula
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Hanrahan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Peterson + Crystal Connors3256% games+15.6% vs expected
Crystal Connors + Kathryn Tunacik3249% games+2.7% vs expected
Kristin Hutchins + Kristin Bretz5157% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Bretz + Crystal Connors3255% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Rocke + Lisa Harrison134 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Sparks + Crystal Connors134 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Rocke + Kristin Hutchins123 matchesnot enough data
Kylee Bryson + Kristin Hutchins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Hazelwood
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Lisa Harrison
9W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%48%52%
2.50
3
Holly Ricker
58W–151L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Kristin Hutchins
17W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Kristin Bretz
18W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
2.5
Carrie Peterson
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.38
Kylee Bryson
22W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.32
2.5
Kathryn Tunacik
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Emily Miska
2W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Crystal Connors
16W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Kristin Rocke
22W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Amelya Freed
1W–6L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Sandra Sweetland
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Lindsay Sparks
5W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Katie Mikula
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Megan Hanrahan
16W–42L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.