Teams

ELW Christison

2022 Pinellas Combo 18 & Over Weekend Summer · 7.5 M Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-27vs Pinellas/DsaLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaren McGovern / Caleb Hirsch vs Brian Hodapp / Jose Jarabo4-6, 3-6
2022-08-22Won 20
W#2 DoublesRobert Hill / Steve Unger vs Robert Mahler / John Pisciotta6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPatrick LaLone / Scott McGovern vs Harold Smart / Jonathan Mines6-2, 6-3
2022-08-14vs RCSP FantauzzoLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Hill / Steve Unger vs Douglas Hicks / Jamie Dennis6-7, 2-6
2022-08-06vs SPTC Holliday 7.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesPatrick LaLone / Scott McGovern vs Paul Willett / Jack Willett4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDaren McGovern / Philip Noll vs Rob Perry / Khuat Do6-4, 6-1
2022-07-30vs McMullen HalmWon 20
W#2 DoublesPhilip Noll / Daren McGovern vs John McConnell / Evan Wimberly6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Hill / Steve Unger vs Kyle Robertshaw / Garrett Prochaska6-3, 6-2
2022-07-23vs Pinellas/DsaLost 01
L#3 DoublesScott McGovern / Marty Finkelstein vs Dane Houston / James Bettencourt5-7, 6-7
2022-07-09vs RCSP FantauzzoSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSteve Unger / Joey Patti vs Kevin Fantauzzo / Douglas Hicks6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPhilip Noll / Scott McGovern vs Nga Duong / Jamie Dennis7-5, 6-2
2022-06-25vs SPTC Holliday 7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Hill / Steve Unger vs Lucas MCWHITE / NICHOLAS INNISS7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Ray Pasinski
published
3.84
Scott McGovern
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.82
Daren McGovern
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Caleb Hirsch
published 4
3.67
Bryant Moore
published 4
3.34
Patrick LaLone
published
3.17
Philip Noll
published
3.14
Steve Unger
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Steve Hueholt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daren McGovern + Scott McGovern10363% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ray Pasinski
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
4
Scott McGovern
59W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Daren McGovern
157W–88L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Caleb Hirsch
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Bryant Moore
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Patrick LaLone
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Philip Noll
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Steve Unger
105W–85L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
Steve Hueholt
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.