Teams

SKY PINK

2023 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-09vs GTC PURPLEWon 10
W#2 DoublesCamilla Almuti / Erika Sabatos vs Ashley Stevens / Gwendolyn Bradshaw6-1, 6-0
2023-08-02vs DTC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Crockett / Erika Sabatos vs Kwai Kendall Grove / Stephanie Martins6-4, 6-3
2023-07-19vs DTC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesErika Sabatos / Jennifer Parnell vs Danielle Remington / Molly Garg4-6, 4-6
2023-07-12Won 10
W#1 SinglesErika Sabatos vs Catherine Kraft6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-05vs GTC PURPLEWon 20
W#1 DoublesCamilla Almuti / Erika Sabatos vs AMY SITZE / Cyndie Miller6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelissa Cantu / Shelley Jewell vs Gwendolyn Bradshaw / Jada Dixon6-2, 6-1
2023-06-28vs DTC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesShelley Jewell / Melissa Cantu vs Tina Friedman / Dana Pianowski6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Jennifer Parnell
published
3.22
Erika Sabatos
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Amy Raval
published 3.5
3.10
Camilla Almuti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.07
Joelle Klein
published
3.03
Shelley Jewell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Rebecca Schneider
published
2.81
Amy Crockett
published 3
2.77
Melissa Cantu
published
2.63
Erin Mann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camilla Almuti + Erika Sabatos11754% games+5.9% vs expected
Melissa Cantu + Shelley Jewell5359% games+4.1% vs expected
Erin Mann + Amy Crockett4352% games−4.4% vs expected
Erika Sabatos + Shelley Jewell6070% gamesnot enough data
Camilla Almuti + Shelley Jewell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Parnell
38W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Erika Sabatos
105W–60L career · 5 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Amy Raval
18W–21L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
3
Camilla Almuti
98W–49L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.10
Joelle Klein
23W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Shelley Jewell
65W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
Rebecca Schneider
20W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Amy Crockett
13W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Melissa Cantu
19W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
Erin Mann
21W–17L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.