Teams

BBTC-MATTHEWS

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over-GC · Women 5.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-09vs Swetman TOCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesDonna Matthews / Rachael Duda vs Sandy Gaskill / Meagan Baskin1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAllyson Winter / Tyler Ash vs Virginia Lang / Hillary Mathis4-6, 1-6
2024-10-07vs BBTC Brehm 18+ 5.5 ComboWon 21
W#1 DoublesStacey Rishel / Elan Buckley vs Wendy Ray / Pam Berdine6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTyler Ash / Brianna Beesley vs Adrianne Jones / Tori Plott6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCarol Payne / Maggie Hester vs Dana Delvescovo / Shirley Brehm4-6, 5-7
2024-10-02vs BBTC Brehm 18+ 5.5 ComboSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrianna Beesley / Tyler Ash vs Jessica Hightower / Dana Delvescovo6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMaggie Hester / Carol Payne vs Shirley Brehm / Mollie Rockstad2-6, 1-6
2024-09-16vs Swetman TOCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDonna Matthews / Stacey Rishel vs Shari Newman / Schyler St Amant6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRachael Duda / Elan Buckley vs Meagan Baskin / Virginia Lang3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Brianna Beesley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.93
Stacey Rishel
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.72
Maggie Day
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.71
Allyson Winter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Carrie Fish
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Rachael Duda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.27
Elan Buckley
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Barbara Gay
published 2.5
Carol Payne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.03
Tyler Ash
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Maggie Hester
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brianna Beesley + Stacey Rishel4155% gamesnot enough data
Brianna Beesley + Tyler Ash303 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Rishel + Tyler Ash123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brianna Beesley
53W–28L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.07
Stacey Rishel
67W–75L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.93
Maggie Day
15W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Allyson Winter
12W–28L career · 1 line in 2024
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Carrie Fish
24W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
2.66
Rachael Duda
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
2.65
2.5
Elan Buckley
19W–46L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Barbara Gay
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Carol Payne
9W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tyler Ash
11W–25L career · 8 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Maggie Hester
11W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.