Teams

Keogh-Forty Love & Money

2023 One Doubles - Summer · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-10vs Memmott - KaPOW!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShanan Hedges / Leah Knight vs Lauren Memmott / Chandra VanPaepeghem2-6, 5-7
2023-08-06vs Fehrenbach/SipeLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrynn Brady / Shanan Hedges vs Mi Ae Kim / Aija Seay4-6, 2-6
2023-06-29vs Nguyen/Gano-Ballieve ItLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeah Knight / Brynn Brady vs Angela Gano / Thuy Nguyen1-6, 1-6
2023-06-27vs Cook Let it Go!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeah Knight / Brynn Brady vs Karen Cook / Tanya Stambuk6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-25vs SWW-ButtorffWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeah Knight / Shanan Hedges vs Bobbie Bailey / Anne Bennett5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-14vs Nemetz-Love HurtsWon 10
W#1 DoublesBronwyn Rogers / Shanan Hedges vs Stacie Nemetz / Teresa Avila6-3, 6-3
2023-06-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesBronwyn Rogers / Shanan Hedges vs Lisa Smith / Karen Jones6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Memmott - KaPOW!6161352
2Fehrenbach/Sipe5252562
3SWW-Buttorff5252757
4Cook Let it Go!4343757
5Nguyen/Gano-Ballieve It3434860
6Keogh-Forty Love & Money3434972
7Nemetz-Love Hurts25251068
8Smith - Summer "Love"07071482

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Bronwyn Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Shanan Hedges
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Leah Knight
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Brynn Brady
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bronwyn Rogers + Shanan Hedges8949% games−0.5% vs expected
Brynn Brady + Leah Knight1638% games−6.5% vs expected
Shanan Hedges + Brynn Brady31041% games−9.6% vs expected
Bronwyn Rogers + Brynn Brady213 matchesnot enough data
Shanan Hedges + Leah Knight213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bronwyn Rogers
51W–49L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Shanan Hedges
68W–87L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Leah Knight
57W–82L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Brynn Brady
40W–80L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.