Teams

Ra.Tewari18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-19vs Il.Moundous18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoshua Franceschina / Brian Smith vs Ilya Moundous / Nicholas Camilleri5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJ Wilbur Dotson vs Phillip Cardella6-1, 6-1
2025-05-18vs Je.Fadool18AWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoshua Franceschina / Christopher Fletcher vs Carlos Garcia-Shelton / Zachary Nelson6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJ Wilbur Dotson vs Matthew Tomayko6-3, 6-1
2025-05-07vs Je.Fadool18AWon 20
W#1 DoublesRavi Tewari / Praveen Chandrasekhar vs Jeffrey Fadool / Matthew Tomayko4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoshua Franceschina / Michael Holt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-29vs Ja.Hull18ALost 01
L#1 SinglesJ Wilbur Dotson vs Andres Carro4-6, 2-6
2025-04-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesPraveen Chandrasekhar / Patrick Longest vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-30vs Il.Moundous18AWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Holt / Joshua Franceschina vs Phillip Cardella / Nicholas Camilleri6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJ Wilbur Dotson / Christopher Fletcher vs Jarod Styres / Connor Wilkins6-4, 6-3
2025-03-23vs Ja.Hull18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJ Wilbur Dotson / Jake McCartney vs David Chermak / Leo Young6-2, 6-0
2025-03-09vs Il.Moundous18ASplit 11
L#1 SinglesJ Wilbur Dotson vs Jensen Martin2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Smith / Joshua Franceschina vs Aneesh Kodali / Jonathan Hodges6-2, 6-4
2025-03-02vs Ja.Hull18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJake McCartney / J Wilbur Dotson vs Elliott Sperr / Grant McGrew6-1, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
Joshua Franceschina
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.78
J Wilbur Dotson
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 5
Jake McCartney
published 5
4.71
Patrick Longest
published
4.60
Ravi Tewari
published
4.32
Praveen Chandrasekhar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joshua Franceschina + Praveen Chandrasekhar303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Joshua Franceschina
80W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.81
5
J Wilbur Dotson
33W–15L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
4.78
5
Jake McCartney
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patrick Longest
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.71
Ravi Tewari
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.60
4.5
Praveen Chandrasekhar
139W–77L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
4.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.