Teams

WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 NEL Pioneer Park Jonen

2025 WI Mixed 18 & Over · WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesNatalie Brandt / David Wiesner vs Duane Brandt / Ann Franz3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTheresa Palasota / Parker Christianson vs Michael Heile / Emily Holland4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKaitlyn Jonen / Brian Anderson vs Brian Spaeth / Jackie Dumke4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesTara Sherman / Andrew Terry vs Michael Heile / Emily Holland2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChelsea Watry / Jacques Verbauwhede vs Steve Petrinski / Galina Petrinska3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSue Roberts / Glen Sherman vs Brian Spaeth / Jackie Dumke6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesHeather Strayer / David Wiesner vs Galina Petrinska / Steve Petrinski5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Palasota / Jacques Verbauwhede vs Brian Spaeth / Emily Holland2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Anderson / Sue Roberts vs Sheri Brannen / David Gahagan4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesAndrew Terry / Erica Shookman vs Galina Petrinska / Steve Petrinski1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNatalie Brandt / Zachary Brandt vs Kim Perna / Todd Hammond2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaitlyn Jonen / Brandon Jonen vs Duane Brandt / Sheri Brannen6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesTara Sherman / Zachary Brandt vs Emily Holland / David Gahagan1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChelsea Watry / Jacques Verbauwhede vs Duane Brandt / Sheri Brannen6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKaitlyn Jonen / Brandon Jonen vs Jackie Dumke / Todd Hammond2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesParker Christianson / Theresa Palasota vs Sheri Brannen / David Gahagan6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Strayer / Zachary Brandt vs Duane Brandt / Kim Perna6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSue Roberts / Glen Sherman vs Jackie Dumke / Todd Hammond7-5, 6-2
L#1 DoublesErica Shookman / David Wiesner vs Emily Holland / Todd Hammond0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Palasota / Parker Christianson vs Kim Perna / David Gahagan5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSue Roberts / Glen Sherman vs Brian Spaeth / Jackie Dumke6-4, 6-0
L#1 DoublesChelsea Watry / Jacques Verbauwhede vs Brian Spaeth / Emily Holland3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaitlyn Jonen / Brian Anderson vs Kim Perna / David Gahagan0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHeather Strayer / Zachary Brandt vs Duane Brandt / Ann Franz6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Kaitlyn Jonen
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.83
Sue Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.81
Jacques Verbauwhede
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Erica Shookman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Andrew Terry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Tara Sherman
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.38
Parker Christianson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Heather Strayer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Natalie Brandt
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.22
Chelsea Watry
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.22
David Wiesner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Theresa Palasota
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.84
Brandon Jonen
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.66
Glen Sherman
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Zachary Brandt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Terry + Tara Sherman6354% games−1.9% vs expected
Kaitlyn Jonen + Brandon Jonen10653% games−8.4% vs expected
Tara Sherman + Glen Sherman6547% games−10.2% vs expected
David Wiesner + Erica Shookman4448% games−16.4% vs expected
Jacques Verbauwhede + Chelsea Watry5455% gamesnot enough data
Sue Roberts + Glen Sherman4353% gamesnot enough data
Erica Shookman + Brandon Jonen6065% gamesnot enough data
David Wiesner + Kaitlyn Jonen314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kaitlyn Jonen
177W–96L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
Sue Roberts
75W–86L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Jacques Verbauwhede
74W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
3.5
Erica Shookman
135W–59L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.60
3.5
Andrew Terry
58W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
Tara Sherman
150W–105L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Parker Christianson
12W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.38
3.5
Heather Strayer
50W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Natalie Brandt
50W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
3
Chelsea Watry
89W–38L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.22
3.5
David Wiesner
18W–21L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
Theresa Palasota
102W–175L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Brandon Jonen
60W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Glen Sherman
45W–72L career · 8 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
Zachary Brandt
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.