Teams

Blair

2025 Calvert Tri-Level · Calvert Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-28vs PhungWon 10
W#2 DoublesAshly Blair / Lori Romanek vs Patricia Louden / Cynthia Clinton Brown6-0, 6-0
2025-08-21vs PhungSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNancy van Winter / Susan Maier vs MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG / Karolyn Clarke6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAshly Blair / Lori Romanek vs Kristina Lebron / Cynthia Clinton Brown2-6, 1-6
2025-08-12vs PhungLost 01
L#2 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Ashly Blair vs Sabra Szczyglowski / Kristina Lebron3-6, 3-6
2025-08-07vs PhungLost 01
L#2 DoublesAshly Blair / Lori Romanek vs MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG / Cynthia Clinton Brown2-6, 2-6
2025-08-05vs PhungLost 02
L#1 DoublesMegan Gladwell / Nancy van Winter vs Dannielle Freeman / Tia Briscoe1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Cindi Hodskins vs Nhi Phung / Karolyn Clarke0-6, 4-6
2025-07-29vs PhungLost 01
L#2 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Ashly Blair vs MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG / Kristina Lebron3-6, 1-6
2025-07-24vs PhungLost 02
L#1 DoublesTammy Bowie / Nancy van Winter vs Jessica Bynum / Tia Briscoe2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Lori Romanek vs MATITIA SEALE COMMISSIONG / Karolyn Clarke3-6, 2-6
2025-07-22vs PhungLost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy van Winter / Joan Ferrell vs Dannielle Freeman / Tia Briscoe2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Calvert Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Susan Maier
published
3.54
Nancy van Winter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Megan Gladwell
published
3.50
3.50
Joan Ferrell
published
3.19
Rosalie Hooper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Cindi Hodskins
published 3.5
3.18
Lori Romanek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.74
Karen Adriani
published
2.72
2.69
Carol Donovan
published 3
Tammy Bowie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rosalie Hooper + Lori Romanek1738% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Maier
14W–3L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Nancy van Winter
69W–70L career · 4 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Megan Gladwell
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Jacqueline Kelly-Bankins
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Joan Ferrell
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Rosalie Hooper
188W–181L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Cindi Hodskins
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Lori Romanek
45W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Karen Adriani
0W–11L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%0%
2.74
3
Deborah Sneeuwjagt
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
3
Carol Donovan
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
Tammy Bowie
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.